Forgione, avocat à Solopaca (Bénévent). Le gouvernement italien («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M.   U.   Leanza, et par son coagent, M. V.

Forgione, avocat à Solopaca (Bénévent). Le gouvernement italien («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M.   U.   Leanza, et par son coagent, M. V. Esposito. 2.

Forgione, avocat à Solopaca (Bénévent). Le gouvernement italien («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M.   U.   Leanza, et par son coagent, M. V. Esposito. 2.

Forgione, avocat à Solopaca (Bénévent). Le gouvernement italien («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M.   U.   Leanza, et par son coagent, M. V. Esposito. 2.

Forgione, avocat à Solopaca (Bénévent). Le gouvernement italien («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M.   U.   Leanza, et par son coagent, M. V. Esposito. 2.

    Criminal proceedings against the applicant On 28 August 1995 the applicant was detained on charges of forgery and aiding and abetting.

By a judgment of 12/06/2002, the Venice Court of Appeal confirmed the applicant’s conviction for forgery and corruption and fixed a global term of imprisonment of three years and eight months, the eight

On 19 February 1999 criminal proceedings were instituted against B. and L. for fraud and forgery; the charges were later reclassified and they were accused only of usurpation of power.

Новосибирска ) concluded that there had been indication of the constituent elements of crimes, specifically abuse of power, bribery and forgery of official records in the actions of the applicant. 6.

Even though the news item had been presented in a somewhat sensationalist style, the overall impression given by the newspaper report was that, rather than inviting the reader to reach any foregone conclusion

opened several criminal cases against the applicant on suspicion of tax evasion, property embezzlement, smuggling, unlawful opening and usage of foreign currency bank accounts, laundry of illegal funds, forgery

applicant company also complained, under the same Article, that as the criminal offences with which the customs official had been charged were declared time-barred, it was unable to (a) obtain proof of the forgery

    The Regional Court stated in its reasoning that the applicant, having entered the country illegally in 1995, had been convicted in Hungary of the offences of kidnapping and of forgery of

pre-trial detention On 8 September 2003 the National Anti-Corruption Prosecution Service (“the   NAP”) started a criminal investigation against the applicant and three   other persons for fraud, forgery

complained on two occasions, in September 2003 and in July 2005 respectively, to the prosecutors in Cephalonia and Athens about eleven police officers whom he accused among other things of blackmail and forgery

    Following criminal proceedings instituted against her and others, on 16   November 2020 the applicant was convicted of document forgery and aggravated fraud.

On 19 October 2001 the Çanakkale public prosecutor filed an indictment with the Çanakkale Assize Court, accusing the applicant of embezzlement and forgery in official documents.

    On 13   February 2017 the Leiria Criminal Court convicted the applicant of two offences of aggravated forgery and one offence of attempted aggravated fraud, and sentenced him to four

District Court (“the District Court”) decided to open an investigation against the applicant on suspicion of having participated in aggravated murder, unauthorised use of another person’s vehicle and forgery