proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine

The first applicant’s cross was discreet and cannot have detracted from her professional appearance.

absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,     Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine

the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine

précitées, dès lors que le choix final de la forme de la crosse est laissé au maître d'œuvre imposant ainsi la présentation des mâts avec les différents types de crosse pour que ce choix puisse être réalisé

absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings [2] ;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine

- Final decisions: Novgorod Regional Court. 01/07/2021 and 02/07/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine

the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine

effective domestic remedies, as required by Article   35 §   1 of the Convention, given that he did not raise, in his appeal lodged with the Appeals Court, the issue of his absence from the cross

à la commune de Bain-de-Bretagne et qu'il avait, par conséquent, engagé la responsabilité de cette dernière ; Considérant que, si l'accident est survenu à un moment où la surveillance des feux de croisement

Cros ; - et les conclusions de Mme Duran-Gottschalk, rapporteure publique. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

final decision: Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic, 24/03/2021,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine

The applicant was then handed over to the police authorities and he is now residing at the Italian Red Cross Centre in Rome.

X... à la société portait sur la distribution de motocyclettes KTM Cross et Enduro, ce qui impliquait l'obligation pour M.

- lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,   Art. 6 (3) (d) - examination/attendance of witnesses - inability to cross-examine

prosecuting party in all sets of the administrative-offence proceedings;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine

circumstances”, from 11.40 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine

état de ses écritures : 1°) de condamner les hospices civils de Lyon (HCL) à lui réparer l'intégralité des préjudices en lien avec l'incident survenu le 25 septembre 2022 au sein de l'hôpital de la Croix