CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 348 résultats pour « Constance DAMAMME »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0420DEC003273496

Admin. suprême

20 avril 1999

20 avril 1999

The Court also awarded to the applicant compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and ordered that the defendant should pay a monthly disability pension to him.

Page 64 sur 118

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0415JUD002219818

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2025

15 avril 2025

in order to make good the pecuniary damage caused to the civil party. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD000934814

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2018

18 décembre 2018

    The Government did not point to any security considerations which may have warranted physical separation of the applicant from his family or their constant supervision by a guard.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC004020705

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2015

24 mars 2015

He also developed “Insulin resistance” and, consequently, required constant supervision of an endocrinologist. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0214JUD006680201

Admin. suprême

14 février 2008

14 février 2008

As to the non-pecuniary damage allegedly sustained by him, the Government noted that only two of his complaints had been declared admissible.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD000125304

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2014

11 décembre 2014

    Damage 94.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD005810408

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2012

24 juillet 2012

It further held that the mere fact of contracting tuberculosis was not enough to entitle him to damages, since for such entitlement to come into play the damage incurred had to be the result of concrete

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD001691521

Admin. suprême

20 février 2024

20 février 2024

It also relates to an allegation of damage to his professional reputation (Article   8 of the Convention). THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1975 and lives in Cluj-Napoca.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0909DEC005468015

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2025

9 septembre 2025

    In application no. 56648/18 the applicants complained that their house, situated in Horlivka, Donetsk Region, had sustained damage as a result of shelling carried out on 28 July 2015 and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0412DEC001446288

Admin. suprême

12 avril 1991

12 avril 1991

  The Government submit that due to the constant damage to cell windows at that time, the cell window had been fitted with a metal plate perforated to allow air to enter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1217JUD003812407

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2009

17 décembre 2009

    Damage 79.     The applicant claimed 20,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 80.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD001651905

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2012

2 octobre 2012

    Damage 83.     The applicant claimed 100,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD004376419

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2021

15 avril 2021

xa0; 2 days   Kryvyy Rig Detention Facility no. 3   07/03/2019 to 04/06/2019   2 months and 29   days 1 inmate 12 m²               2,2-2,9 m² constant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108DEC004942412

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2016

8 novembre 2016

She required constant care. In particular, as she also suffered from diabetes, she had to take medications and have regular meals.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD000920709

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2017

20 juillet 2017

Representative name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD006341716

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2023

12 janvier 2023

end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Domestic compensation awarded (in days) based on total period calculated by national authorities Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522JUD002758513

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2018

22 mai 2018

    Damage 33.     The applicants jointly claimed 5,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 34.     The Government contested the claim. 35.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1213DEC001422988

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 1990

13 décembre 1990

  The latter reported this damage to the housemaster and the second applicant was sent to the headmaster for punishment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522DEC000870204

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2007

22 mai 2007

    Proceedings concerning the applicant’s claims for damages The applicant made several claims for damages in the administrative court proceedings concerning the lawfulness of her stay in the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1203DEC004229098

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2002

3 décembre 2002

The damage inflicted on A has already been proven. In conclusion, the court finds that the care order cannot yet be revoked.

Source officielle