CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0420DEC003273496
20 avril 1999
The Court also awarded to the applicant compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and ordered that the defendant should pay a monthly disability pension to him.
Page 64 sur 118
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0415JUD002219818
15 avril 2025
in order to make good the pecuniary damage caused to the civil party. 6 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD000934814
18 décembre 2018
The Government did not point to any security considerations which may have warranted physical separation of the applicant from his family or their constant supervision by a guard.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC004020705
24 mars 2015
He also developed “Insulin resistance” and, consequently, required constant supervision of an endocrinologist. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0214JUD006680201
14 février 2008
As to the non-pecuniary damage allegedly sustained by him, the Government noted that only two of his complaints had been declared admissible.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD000125304
11 décembre 2014
Damage 94.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD005810408
24 juillet 2012
It further held that the mere fact of contracting tuberculosis was not enough to entitle him to damages, since for such entitlement to come into play the damage incurred had to be the result of concrete
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD001691521
20 février 2024
It also relates to an allegation of damage to his professional reputation (Article 8 of the Convention). THE FACTS 2. The applicant was born in 1975 and lives in Cluj-Napoca.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0909DEC005468015
9 septembre 2025
In application no. 56648/18 the applicants complained that their house, situated in Horlivka, Donetsk Region, had sustained damage as a result of shelling carried out on 28 July 2015 and
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0412DEC001446288
12 avril 1991
The Government submit that due to the constant damage to cell windows at that time, the cell window had been fitted with a metal plate perforated to allow air to enter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1217JUD003812407
17 décembre 2009
Damage 79. The applicant claimed 20,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 80.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD001651905
2 octobre 2012
Damage 83. The applicant claimed 100,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD004376419
15 avril 2021
xa0; 2 days Kryvyy Rig Detention Facility no. 3 07/03/2019 to 04/06/2019 2 months and 29 days 1 inmate 12 m² 2,2-2,9 m² constant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108DEC004942412
8 novembre 2016
She required constant care. In particular, as she also suffered from diabetes, she had to take medications and have regular meals.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD000920709
20 juillet 2017
Representative name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD006341716
12 janvier 2023
end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Domestic compensation awarded (in days) based on total period calculated by national authorities Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522JUD002758513
22 mai 2018
Damage 33. The applicants jointly claimed 5,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 34. The Government contested the claim. 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1213DEC001422988
13 décembre 1990
The latter reported this damage to the housemaster and the second applicant was sent to the headmaster for punishment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522DEC000870204
22 mai 2007
Proceedings concerning the applicant’s claims for damages The applicant made several claims for damages in the administrative court proceedings concerning the lawfulness of her stay in the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1203DEC004229098
3 décembre 2002
The damage inflicted on A has already been proven. In conclusion, the court finds that the care order cannot yet be revoked.