Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-850733-871603
9 octobre 2003
9 octobre 2003
Since 1989 the applicants have been unable to access the money they deposited.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-106900
14 septembre 2011
14 septembre 2011
Annex to the Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)114 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Becker, Berger, Siebert and Lück against Germany Information on the payment
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC001760802
7 octobre 2008
7 octobre 2008
COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that his detention between 23 and 30 October 2001 had been unlawful and arbitrary.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108DEC002627908
8 janvier 2013
8 janvier 2013
It held, inter alia, that the claimant (the director) had not been employed in accordance with the Employment Act, but had been designated director.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1026DEC006147900
26 octobre 2000
26 octobre 2000
A further stay in Turkey had been impossible for them.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0703DEC006333200
3 juillet 2003
3 juillet 2003
The prosecutor did not accept that the applicant had not been permitted to use toilets.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622DEC005139899
22 juin 2006
22 juin 2006
Many villagers had already been awarded compensation for the damage they had sustained. B.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0117DEC005139299
17 janvier 2002
17 janvier 2002
On 14 October 1998, the Industrial Appeals Tribunal informed the parties that a second hearing had been scheduled for 18 November 1998.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0323DEC005263499
23 mars 2000
23 mars 2000
as if his request had been denied.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0111DEC003564797
11 janvier 2001
11 janvier 2001
he had not been questioned and that Doctors K. and R. had not been questioned either.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC005514800
3 février 2009
3 février 2009
On 18 September 2007 the Court sent a letter to the applicants informing them that notice of the application had been given to the Government of Bulgaria.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202DEC000254305
2 décembre 2008
2 décembre 2008
COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention that his case had not been heard within a reasonable time.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC000563303
7 octobre 2008
7 octobre 2008
COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings against him had been unreasonably lengthy.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2208590-2350859
10 décembre 2007
10 décembre 2007
Ce document fut envoyé au responsable de cette question au sein du Département fédéral des affaires étrangères à Berne et des copies furent adressées à 19 autres personnes du gouvernement suisse
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC005757600
11 octobre 2001
11 octobre 2001
Since then he has mostly been on sick-leave.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC005094399
4 mai 2000
4 mai 2000
Berger, Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application introduced on 30 June 1999 and registered on 16 September 1999, Having deliberated, decides as follows: &#
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC000007602
1 juin 2006
1 juin 2006
very high, they had been paid insufficient interest.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1207DEC005263499
7 décembre 2000
7 décembre 2000
The applicant argues that Article 59 § 4 has been introduced only as from 29 September 1999, while his case had been pending before that date for about nine years.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0728JUD005932000
28 juillet 2005
28 juillet 2005
Following its principal judgment the Court has been informed that a friendly settlement has been reached between the Government and the applicant with respect to the latter's claims under
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC003959798
22 mars 2001
22 mars 2001
The domestic remedies have therefore not been exhausted as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officiellePage 64 sur 4750