In R.A.’s opinion it was unlikely that the applicant had been aware that the operation of these machines had been illegal. 2.     The proceedings before the Federal Gaming Board 10.

It therefore awards 1,250 euros (EUR), that is the equivalent of this sum to the applicant. 56.

It was not, however, possible to identify those who had resisted the police as they ran away. 9 .

He said that the Prosecutor General had visited the prison in mid-September 1999, but the applicant was not aware of the results of the visit.

In the light of the circumstances of the case, and making an assessment on an equitable basis as required by Article 41 of the Convention, the Court awards the applicant EUR   12,500 in respect of

    On 27 April 2011 a piece appeared on the “London Muslim” blog, a blog hosted on the Blogger.com website.

    The applicant claimed an award in respect of pecuniary damage in the amount of 80,000 Serbian dinars (RSD), corresponding to the fine imposed. 48.

On the way, the taxi driver had stopped at a service station where he and Mr   Apti Zaynalov had been apprehended by armed men and driven away. Shortly after Mr Z.

It therefore decided not to award the applicant any just satisfaction in respect of non-pecuniary damage. I.

  He was holding in his hands the pieces of his ragged vestments and his cap which could no longer be worn.   His vestments were full of spitting and so was his face.

Any award should not exceed EUR 2,300. 72.

Mr Pieri escaped from prison on 22 January 1984; he was recaptured on 1 July 1987.

They are not required to set out their reasons, or what each juror thought of each piece of evidence.

They asserted that the prosecutor’s decision was only one of many pieces of evidence considered by the courts.

  They also took away photographs of the applicant's family and his diary.

Thereupon two attempts with the same mouth-piece as used by the applicant had been made by police officer R., which both produced valid results.

having heard evidence from several parties, including the financial director of one of the Dianoor companies, Mr Justice Bodey in the High Court accepted that as a matter of law, the court could not “pierce

In winter, the heating in the cells was often switched off, and the tap water was unsuitable for drinking, smelt muddy and contained rust and pieces of metal.

A judgment of 22 January 1997 in his favour, ordering the return of one piece of land, was not enforced.