Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, concerning different aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of the organisers or participants of public events; Karelin v.

    Existence of a deprivation of liberty 19.

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, concerning various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of the organisers or participants of public events; Teslenko and Others v.

Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, concerning various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of the organisers or participants of public events; Teslenko and Others v. Russia , nos.

    Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: ...

qu'à la suite d'un appel d'offre organisé par la SNCF, la société Citram Aquitaine s'est vu confier, pour la période du 8 au 11 mai 2008, le transport des voyageurs entre les gares de Bordeaux et de Libourne

      fine of RUB   10,000 Moscow City Court 14/11/2018                 Moscow City Court 11/05/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty

The applicant further complains under Articles 5 § 4 and 13 of the Convention that he obtained no court review of his deprivation of liberty. THE LAW   1.

days (i) 02/12/2019, Moscow City Court       (ii) 01/07/2020, Moscow City Court rotation - event classified as assembly post facto (both episodes) Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention, in view of the fact that in 2018 the courts refused to release him from serving

      QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention?

du 06 mars 2025 APPELANTS : Monsieur [S] [Z] né le 26 Mars 1994 à [Localité 12] de nationalité Française demeurant [Adresse 9] Représenté par Me Laure LABARRIERE, avocat au barreau de LIBOURNE

On   20 December 2019 the medical institution requested the trial court to amend the order and release the applicant on condition that he undergoes compulsory psychiatric treatment at liberty.

Vu l'ordonnance du juge des libertés et de la détention au tribunal judiciaire de Libourne en date du 25 octobre 2023 ordonnant la poursuite de l'hospitalisation complète de Madame [N] [M].

de l'exécution de la décision du 7 juillet 2022 par laquelle la rectrice de l'académie de Bordeaux a rejeté leur demande d'affectation de leur fils B D en classe de 6ème au collège Les Dagueys de Libourne

La centre hospitalier de Libourne a émis à l’encontre de Mme A...

Navalnyy   Voronezh   21/04/2021 article 20.2 §   5 of CAO fine of RUB   10,000 Voronezh Regional Court 31/08/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention