It must then examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected of him or her to exhaust domestic remedies (see İlhan v.

that complaints intended to be brought subsequently before the Court should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements (see İlhan

  Royaume­Uni , n o 33394/96, § 30, CEDH   2001 ‑ VII, İlhan   c.   Turquie [GC], n o   22277/93, § 87, CEDH   2000 ‑ VII, et Naoumenko   c.

applicables au présent bail commercial renouvelé à compter du 1er juillet 2021, les indices qui s’appliquent depuis le 1er septembre 2014 pour fixer le montant du loyer renouvelé plafonné sont l’ILC ou l’ILAT

Whatever mode is employed, the authorities must act of their own motion once the matter has come to their attention (see, for example, mutatis mutandis , Ilhan v.

obligations under Article 13 varies depending on the nature of the applicant’s complaint; however, the remedy required by Article 13 must be “effective” in practice as well as in law (see, for example, İlhan

appropriate medical care and, more broadly, the detention of persons suffering from disease in inadequate conditions may, in principle, amount to treatment contrary to Article   3 (see, for example, İlhan

cannot be left to the initiative of the next of kin either to lodge a formal complaint or to take responsibility for the conduct of any investigative procedures (see, for example, mutatis mutandis , Ilhan

informed of a situation that gave rise to a suspicion that an offence had been committed was obliged to investigate the facts by conducting the inquiries necessary to identify the perpetrators (see İlhan

Turkey (no. 225/02)   Violation of Article 6 § 1 (fairness) The applicant, İlhan Çomak, is a Turkish national who was born in 1973.

whole, demonstrates that it covers not only intentional killing but also the situations where it is permitted to use force which may result, as an unintended outcome, in the deprivation of life (see İlhan

A   lack of appropriate medical care may amount to treatment contrary to Article 3 (see İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no.   22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII, and Sarban v.

  Turkey (dec.), no. 63181/00, 5 October 2004; and İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 61, ECHR 2000 ‑ VII).

neither absolute nor capable of being applied automatically; for the purposes of reviewing whether it has been observed, it is essential to have regard to the circumstances of the individual case (see İlhan

Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, 27.6.2000, § 84, to be reported in ECHR 2000–VII).

national authorities conducted an effective investigation into the allegations and that the fact that the investigation did not yield any results does not mean that the authorities can be reproached (see İlhan

147, ECHR   2001 ‑ IV) where this has been perceived as necessary to ensure that the rights guaranteed under the Convention are not theoretical or illusory, but practical and effective ( İlhan

Consequently, States are dispensed from answering to an international body for their acts before they have had an opportunity to put matters right through their own legal system (see Ilhan v.

or restricted access to toilet, overcrowding Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000   13801/20 11/02/2020 Ilkan