CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

23 798 résultats pour « Held Sutter »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD003309908

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2010

16 décembre 2010

    From 20 October 2006 to 27 December 2007 the applicant was held in remand centre no. IZ-71/1 in Tula. 15.

Source officielle

Page 63 sur 1190

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0921JUD001067502

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2004

21 septembre 2004

    On 24 October 1996 the court held a hearing. 22.     The next hearing, which was to be held on 7 November 1996, was adjourned because A.P. had failed to appear.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0309DEC001176785

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1989

9 mars 1989

  For that reason those private fishing rights owners who suffer financial losses as a result of the free fishing with hand-held tackle, should be entitled to compensation for such losses in accordance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0728JUD001531889

Admin. suprême

28 juillet 1998

28 juillet 1998

    The Cypriot Government supported the applicant’s claims under this head.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0705DEC002505294

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 1995

5 juillet 1995

At 18:15 the Head of Police briefed the Minister of Justice and Public Order.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD006457001

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2007

19 juillet 2007

    On 20 January 1995 the Diyarbakır State Security Court held a hearing in the presence of a military judge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0211JUD003866597

Admin. suprême

11 février 2003

11 février 2003

    On 6 March 1996 the court held a hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0715JUD004207898

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2003

15 juillet 2003

    The court held hearings on 27 January, 11 April and 9 May 1995. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115JUD002689095

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2005

15 novembre 2005

A meeting between the parties took place on 5 March 1996 and an inspection in situ was held on 3 June 1996.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0111DEC001805691

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 1994

11 janvier 1994

  During a summer holiday in 1984 with her family in Morocco, the applicant's grandmother became very ill.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0517JUD006219400

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2005

17 mai 2005

The sum due could not, therefore, be enforced as claimed by the applicant. 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55458

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 1988

26 octobre 1988

that there had been a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) of the convention in the case of Mr James Boyle;   - held that there had been no violation of Article 13 (art. 13);   - held that the United

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49344

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 1993

26 janvier 1993

on 2 April 1992, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49351

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 1993

26 janvier 1993

on 18 November 1991, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49345

Admin. suprême

18 mai 1993

18 mai 1993

opinion that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 475th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49362

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 1993

9 novembre 1993

on 2 April 1992, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49341

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 1992

10 novembre 1992

on 13 December 1991, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1018JUD005952300

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2007

18 octobre 2007

    The court held a hearing on 18 February 2002. 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC002656108

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

On 8 October 2002 the Wągrowiec District Court held the first hearing. Between November 2002 and October 2007 the court held about 57   hearings, at least 36 were adjourned or cancelled.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1028JUD000533907

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2010

28 octobre 2010

The Court considers it reasonable to award the applicant the sum of EUR 1,500 inclusive of VAT under this head. 62.

Source officielle