CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD003309908
16 décembre 2010
From 20 October 2006 to 27 December 2007 the applicant was held in remand centre no. IZ-71/1 in Tula. 15.
Page 63 sur 1190
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0921JUD001067502
21 septembre 2004
On 24 October 1996 the court held a hearing. 22. The next hearing, which was to be held on 7 November 1996, was adjourned because A.P. had failed to appear.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0309DEC001176785
9 mars 1989
For that reason those private fishing rights owners who suffer financial losses as a result of the free fishing with hand-held tackle, should be entitled to compensation for such losses in accordance
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0728JUD001531889
28 juillet 1998
The Cypriot Government supported the applicant’s claims under this head.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0705DEC002505294
5 juillet 1995
At 18:15 the Head of Police briefed the Minister of Justice and Public Order.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD006457001
19 juillet 2007
On 20 January 1995 the Diyarbakır State Security Court held a hearing in the presence of a military judge.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0211JUD003866597
11 février 2003
On 6 March 1996 the court held a hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0715JUD004207898
15 juillet 2003
The court held hearings on 27 January, 11 April and 9 May 1995. 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115JUD002689095
15 novembre 2005
A meeting between the parties took place on 5 March 1996 and an inspection in situ was held on 3 June 1996.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0111DEC001805691
11 janvier 1994
During a summer holiday in 1984 with her family in Morocco, the applicant's grandmother became very ill.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0517JUD006219400
17 mai 2005
The sum due could not, therefore, be enforced as claimed by the applicant. 31.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55458
26 octobre 1988
that there had been a violation of Article 8 (art. 8) of the convention in the case of Mr James Boyle; - held that there had been no violation of Article 13 (art. 13); - held that the United
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49344
26 janvier 1993
on 2 April 1992, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the
ECLI:CEDH:001-49351
on 18 November 1991, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of
ECLI:CEDH:001-49345
18 mai 1993
opinion that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention; Whereas, at the 475th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held
ECLI:CEDH:001-49362
9 novembre 1993
ECLI:CEDH:001-49341
10 novembre 1992
on 13 December 1991, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1018JUD005952300
18 octobre 2007
The court held a hearing on 18 February 2002. 33.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623DEC002656108
23 juin 2009
On 8 October 2002 the Wągrowiec District Court held the first hearing. Between November 2002 and October 2007 the court held about 57 hearings, at least 36 were adjourned or cancelled.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1028JUD000533907
28 octobre 2010
The Court considers it reasonable to award the applicant the sum of EUR 1,500 inclusive of VAT under this head. 62.