CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-529
17 mai 2011
Slovenia - 57655/08 Decision 17.5.2011 [Section V] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Oral hearing Lack of hearing in summary administrative-offences proceedings: inadmissible &#
Page 63 sur 1853
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0907DEC001262887
7 septembre 1990
At a hearing on 13 June 1984 the possibilities of a friendly settlement were again discussed. The hearing of the applicant as a party was continued on 24 August 1984.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0318DEC000716904
18 mars 2010
The first hearing was scheduled for 8 May 2002.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD002441105
19 avril 2011
The hearing of 16 June 2003 did not take place because the defendant’s representative failed to attend. 31 . The next hearing was scheduled for 20 August 2003.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC005992708
24 janvier 2017
Consequences of failure to appear at a hearing “1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608JUD002835306
8 juin 2010
The Court first notes that that the entitlement to a “public hearing” in Article 6 § 1 implies a right to an oral, adversarial hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1202DEC006844801
2 décembre 2003
The applicant submits that the hearing commenced on 28 February 1997, that is, approximately 14 months after the case was ready for a hearing.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207DEC005220207
7 décembre 2021
He explicitly expressed his wish to be present in the appeal hearing. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109DEC000720622
9 novembre 2023
The next hearing took place on 17 September 2020, while the hearing scheduled for 23 November 2020 was adjourned upon a request of the defendant’s representative, due to quarantine, and the hearing
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522JUD000582603
22 mai 2012
One hearing was postponed for reasons not evident from the file.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0505DEC003532121
5 mai 2026
The prosecutor asked her whether she agreed to participate in the hearing via videolink.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303DEC004097209
3 mars 2020
the three judges hearing his case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0505DEC001826691
5 mai 1993
Following a hearing on 19 December 1986 where only the applicant and her lawyer appeared, and a hearing on 23 September 1987 where both parties appeared, the Appeals Tribunal, having examined the file,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1128DEC003671104
28 novembre 2006
The applicant was present at the first three hearings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0307DEC004211698
7 mars 2000
The hearing of the second claim was fixed for 5 June 1995.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC005778712
27 septembre 2016
bring him to that hearing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0430DEC003548997
30 avril 2002
The hearing was adjourned until 19 January 1998.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188800
27 novembre 2018
If so: Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charge against her, given her and her lawyer’s absence from the hearing of the appellate court, which was conducted
ECLI:CEDH:002-1782
16 décembre 2008
Spain - 30643/04 Judgment 16.12.2008 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Public hearing Lack of a public hearing before appellate court: no violation Facts : In
ECLI:CEDH:001-236017
27 août 2024
The Supreme Court nevertheless held the oral hearing on 6 June 2023, in which the prosecutor took part.