Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139693
28 novembre 2013
28 novembre 2013
The court also found K. and L. guilty of attempted fraud and illegal possession of firearms. The tribunal comprised one professional judge and two lay assessors.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139885
4 décembre 2013
4 décembre 2013
Moreover, there had been no positive reference letters in respect of the applicant and he did not admit his guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-120331
6 mai 2013
6 mai 2013
On 19 March 2007 the Štip Court of First Instance (“the trial court”) found the applicant guilty on both counts and convicted him to a single sentence of one year’s imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200780
10 janvier 2020
10 janvier 2020
It found the applicant guilty on counts II-a, II-b and III, and sentenced him to three years and six months’ imprisonment by judgment of 8 October 2015.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-166729
23 août 2016
23 août 2016
On 26 December 2006 the District Court found the applicant guilty of murder and sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607DEC002767018
7 juin 2022
7 juin 2022
The Court notes that the language employed by Mr N.C. is rather part of the context of the latter hypothesis, since it does not suggest that he regarded the applicant as being guilty.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207432
9 décembre 2020
9 décembre 2020
On 16 January 2017 the Šiauliai Regional Court found the applicants guilty of trafficking in human beings (Article 147 § 2 of the Criminal Code), of exploitation for forced labour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115405
21 novembre 2012
21 novembre 2012
The applicant was found guilty of a minor offence against public order (battery) under section 3(1)(2) of the Public Order Act 2000 (see “Relevant domestic law” below) for which he was imposed a fine of
Source officielle1re Section - 2e Chambre
DTA_2535541_20260331
31 mars 2026
31 mars 2026
B..., représenté par Me Guillier, a présenté des observations en réponse à ce moyen d’ordre public par un mémoire enregistré le 11 mars 2026.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2345
20 septembre 2007
20 septembre 2007
He also pleaded not guilty. The Riga Regional Court found the applicant guilty of the crime covered by Article 68-3 and sentenced him to six years’ imprisonment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-247959
10 décembre 2025
10 décembre 2025
In those proceedings the applicant had initially pleaded guilty.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0226REP002310393
26 février 1997
26 février 1997
The Court considered that the District Court had thoroughly assessed the evidence and had carefully considered the applicant's guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC000702003
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
In the court’s opinion, in refusing to admit their guilt the accused persons were attempting to avoid criminal liability ...
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126643
2 septembre 2013
2 septembre 2013
Rebuttal of the presumption of innocence required proof of guilt to the criminal standard, this being implicit in the words ‘according to law’.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1009DEC001439688
9 octobre 1990
9 octobre 1990
The applicant could not assume that she had such a considerable knowledge of his case as to have a predetermined view on his guilt.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0405DEC002128393
5 avril 1994
5 avril 1994
Any findings of guilt and the censure (the sentence) must be set out in a written judgment and pronounced in open court.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0409JUD007278012
9 avril 2015
9 avril 2015
Furthermore, he had been twice found guilty of an administrative offence, on 27 April 2006 and 29 July 2009. 25 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0908DEC005757413
8 septembre 2020
8 septembre 2020
On 16 April 2002 the Court of Appeal, acting as a first-instance court, found the applicants guilty of seven different criminal acts (murder and attempted murder), typically assisting others to commit
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177153
30 août 2017
30 août 2017
On the same date and by separate decisions the Khatai District Court found the first and second applicants guilty of distributing literature which had not been approved for import under Article
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003245196
9 septembre 1998
9 septembre 1998
The condition set in the final provision of Section 150 (2) of Act No. 74/1974 that the applicant is deemed more likely to be innocent than guilty.
Source officiellePage 63 sur 692