The Supreme Court may impose a fine on the prosecutor, defence counsel or both for making a groundless appeal.

Both the Procurator General and the applicant withdrew the appeals in the proceedings against the applicant and those against the applicant companies.

    The applicant submitted that in light of the Court’s constant case-law both respondent Governments had jurisdiction. 13.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES As regards both applications   1.

    On 9 March 2015 both applicants, along with around 50   other participants, took part in the demonstration.

The child declared that it wanted to be both with the mother and the applicant.

The Prison Department stated that the law did not provide for short–term visits for spouses who were both convicted and serving their imprisonment sentences.

Both sets of proceedings are currently pending before the Greek courts.

The statement also made links between this incident and other attacks allegedly carried out by members of the security forces, both RUC and UDR, and loyalist paramilitaries.

  The Court noted that the proceedings in both cases had lasted for almost nine years.

On 4 August 1997 the Auditor began to tax both accounts. He completed the taxation four weeks later.

Both cases concerned the applicants’ complaints about the excessive length of civil proceedings in disputes over property.

Both offences were potentially punishable with imprisonment as well.

They submitted an expert opinion which, having regard to both applicants’ relationship with their son and their ability and willingness to care jointly for him, stated that awarding joint custody would

  In order to bring the domestic practice in line with the requirements set forth by the Convention and the Court’s decision, the authorities acted in two directions and undertook both legislative

The applicant made two such applications in December 1996 and in 1997, but was refused leave on both occasions.

  In order to bring the domestic practice in line with the requirements set forth by the Convention and the Court’s decision, the authorities acted in two directions and undertook both legislative

In 2010 both the applicant and her husband applied to a Lithuanian court to have their marriage dissolved. The applicant asked that both daughters be placed to reside permanently with her.

represented by different lawyers, on various dates, all indicated in the appended table; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning Articles 5 and   6 of the Convention in respect of both