CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

94 989 résultats pour « Bernie »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0406JUD007580901

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2006

6 avril 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Page 63 sur 4750

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0427JUD002892202

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2006

27 avril 2006

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. 2.     Article 13 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0406JUD002030002

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2006

6 avril 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0406JUD004227402

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2006

6 avril 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309JUD007751201

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2006

9 mars 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0413JUD002223502

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2006

13 avril 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306JUD000453006

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2012

6 mars 2012

    According to the Court’s case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC002920502

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2006

30 mars 2006

been allowed to return to his village.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD004285702

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0314JUD004480098

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2002

14 mars 2002

The Ombudsman also found that the letter from the CBSS of 16 October 1998 had been opened.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309JUD007570501

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2006

9 mars 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0427JUD003705702

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2006

27 avril 2006

There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. 2.     Article 13 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330JUD007570101

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2006

30 mars 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD003729402

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0427JUD003913702

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2006

27 avril 2006

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cba0bd3db21cbdd8de4c

Appel

17 mai 2011

17 mai 2011

rapidement aux normes de performance, de développer la plate-forme clients de tous les vendeurs, d'investir beaucoup de temps dans la connaissance de la gamme des produits BERNER

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130JUD002825695

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2000

30 novembre 2000

These bomb attacks had occurred after two members of the Carlos group had been arrested in France.

Source officielle
CC

comm

613723decd5801467740f39c

Cassation

28 janvier 2003

28 janvier 2003

X... et à la société Fashion TV d'en utiliser les termes, alors, selon le moyen : 1 / qu'il résulte de l'article 5 de la Convention de Berne que -ainsi que la société Chum le soutenait dans ses conclusions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1203JUD004822199

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2002

3 décembre 2002

She further alleged that there had been a breach of the principle of equality of arms because the two parts of the reporting judge's report had not been sent to her lawyer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202DEC000875705

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2008

2 décembre 2008

not been reasoned.

Source officielle