CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 285 résultats pour « Valentin MACE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0730JUD003398217

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2020

30 juillet 2020

regard to Article   5 of the Convention, there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaints under Article 5 §   1 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Page 62 sur 65

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004619611

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2019

21 novembre 2019

that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the other complaints mentioned in the preceding paragraph (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1010JUD001939710

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2019

10 octobre 2019

and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the complaint mentioned in the preceding paragraph (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709JUD000259217

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2019

9 juillet 2019

has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD003336918

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2023

28 septembre 2023

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD001280017

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2024

11 juillet 2024

Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the victim made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0204JUD006634512

Admin. suprême

4 février 2025

4 février 2025

The BCEA offered to make the payments not as compensation for expropriation, but on the basis of contracts of sale to be entered into by the residents and two individuals, R.K. or Z.I., who were apparently

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0209JUD003075717

Admin. suprême

9 février 2023

9 février 2023

  The Court has accepted that the next-of-kin may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD003888709

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2015

8 octobre 2015

    The applicant complained that the authorities’ refusal to institute criminal proceedings in respect of his complaints of ill-treatment in police custody and unlawful detention had made it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613JUD002505417

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2024

13 juin 2024

has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to examine the admissibility or merits of the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD006619110

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2022

22 septembre 2022

    In these circumstances, the Court finds that the dismissal of her claim on that ground, after it had been pending before the courts for around eight years, essentially made the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0730JUD001017905

Admin. suprême

30 juillet 2020

30 juillet 2020

When the Court delivered its judgment on 11 January 2018, having found a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention and having made an award in respect of the period preceding its judgment, the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609DEC007443514

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2020

9 juin 2020

The Treaty makes it clear that the governance and strategic choices on public service broadcasting lie with Member States.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD004285811

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2022

9 juin 2022

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD000732105

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2012

18 décembre 2012

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0117JUD001240506

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2013

17 janvier 2013

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301DEC000623220

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2022

1 mars 2022

In that interview, V.G. had first claimed that the President of Georgia had misappropriated some of his property and had then made a number of offensive statements about the private life of the President

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0327JUD004788908

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2018

27 mars 2018

When they had also gone to enquire about his whereabouts with his parents-in-law, the third applicant “had attacked them hysterically”, which made the police believe that the first applicant might be hiding

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0725JUD000232720

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2024

25 juillet 2024

no connecting factors to that State • No obligation flowing from international law or the Convention for Contracting States to acquire universal civil jurisdiction • Not unreasonable for a State to make

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2004

8 juillet 2004

to Mr Ilaşcu; documents and statements about Transdniestria and the present application from various administrative authorities in Moldova and the Russian Federation; press cuttings about statements made

Source officielle