CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0730JUD003398217
30 juillet 2020
regard to Article 5 of the Convention, there is no need to give a separate ruling on the complaints under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
Page 62 sur 65
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004619611
21 novembre 2019
that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the other complaints mentioned in the preceding paragraph (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1010JUD001939710
10 octobre 2019
and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the complaint mentioned in the preceding paragraph (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709JUD000259217
9 juillet 2019
has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD003336918
28 septembre 2023
: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD001280017
11 juillet 2024
Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the victim made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0204JUD006634512
4 février 2025
The BCEA offered to make the payments not as compensation for expropriation, but on the basis of contracts of sale to be entered into by the residents and two individuals, R.K. or Z.I., who were apparently
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0209JUD003075717
9 février 2023
The Court has accepted that the next-of-kin may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD003888709
8 octobre 2015
The applicant complained that the authorities’ refusal to institute criminal proceedings in respect of his complaints of ill-treatment in police custody and unlawful detention had made it
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613JUD002505417
13 juin 2024
has dealt with the main legal questions raised by the case and that there is no need to examine the admissibility or merits of the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD006619110
22 septembre 2022
In these circumstances, the Court finds that the dismissal of her claim on that ground, after it had been pending before the courts for around eight years, essentially made the applicant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0730JUD001017905
When the Court delivered its judgment on 11 January 2018, having found a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention and having made an award in respect of the period preceding its judgment, the applicant
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0609DEC007443514
9 juin 2020
The Treaty makes it clear that the governance and strategic choices on public service broadcasting lie with Member States.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0609JUD004285811
9 juin 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD000732105
18 décembre 2012
Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0117JUD001240506
17 janvier 2013
Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301DEC000623220
1 mars 2022
In that interview, V.G. had first claimed that the President of Georgia had misappropriated some of his property and had then made a number of offensive statements about the private life of the President
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0327JUD004788908
27 mars 2018
When they had also gone to enquire about his whereabouts with his parents-in-law, the third applicant “had attacked them hysterically”, which made the police believe that the first applicant might be hiding
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0725JUD000232720
25 juillet 2024
no connecting factors to that State • No obligation flowing from international law or the Convention for Contracting States to acquire universal civil jurisdiction • Not unreasonable for a State to make
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799
8 juillet 2004
to Mr Ilaşcu; documents and statements about Transdniestria and the present application from various administrative authorities in Moldova and the Russian Federation; press cuttings about statements made