Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c;No violation of Art. 3;No violation of Art. 8;Non-pecuniary damage - award

    Merits 1.     Article 5 § 1 of the Convention a)     Period between 26 July 2007 and 5 March 2008. 55.

Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (six-month period, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Art. 2;Violation of Art. 6-1;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for

Preliminary objection dismissed;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect);Violation of Art

    On 1 November 2011 (admissibility) and 14 October 2014 (admissibility and merits) the application was communicated to the Government. 5.

    On 5 October 2018, the Grand Chamber decided to hold a hearing on both the admissibility and merits of that case (Article 29 § 2).

Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (six-month period, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Art. 2;Violation of Art. 6-1;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary

In these circumstances it considers that the objection should be joined to the merits of the applicant's complaint (see, for example, Yaremenko v.

Conclusion : preliminary objection joined to the merits (by majority).

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c;No violation of Art. 3;No violation of Art. 8;Non-pecuniary damage - award

    Merits 1. The parties’ submissions 46.

Accordingly, the Government’s preliminary objection is to be joined to the merits. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 42.

Law – The Government’s preliminary objection:   The Court decided to join to the merits the Government’s preliminary objection that the applicant had not exhausted domestic remedies in so far as he

Enfin, l'article 13 du même décret précise que : " Les fonctionnaires sont inscrits au tableau par ordre de mérite.

Les candidats dont le mérite est jugé égal sont départagés par l'ancienneté dans le grade. ».

L'article 13 du même décret précise : " Les fonctionnaires sont inscrits au tableau par ordre de mérite.

aux dépens des pourvois ; Vu l'article 700 du code de procédure civile, condamne la société Merle à payer à la société Le Belvedère la somme de 2 500 euros ; rejette la demande de la société Merle ;