The article began on the first page of the newspaper with a photograph of a summer house owned by Givi Lominadze, at the relevant time an exiled Member of Parliament from the Abkhazian legislature

König alleges such heads of injury but he does not prove their existence or specify their extent; neither does he indicate the sums to which he considers himself entitled by way of just satisfaction.

    On various dates the relevant district courts upheld the decisions of the head of the Civil Status Office.

that there had been a violation of Article 14 of the   Convention taken together with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (art. 14+P1-1);   - held that it was not necessary to examine the case under

;   Whereas in its judgment of 27 November 1997, the Court:         _ dismissed, by seven votes to two, the Government's preliminary objection;         _ held

unanimously the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;        Whereas, at the 487th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held

, by six votes to one, that there had been a violation of Article 8 (art. 8);   - held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 3 (art. 3);   - held unanimously that the Netherlands

xa0;  Whereas in its judgment of 22 February 1994 the Court:        - dismissed, unanimously, the government's preliminary objections;        - held

        On 16 May 1990 T.K., Head of the District Surveying Office of Vaasa, took over the Expert's duties.

At a hearing held on 25 August 2004 the applicant’s sister gave her oral evidence. Another hearing was held on 26 October 2004.

The domestic court held that from January to July 2009 the applicant had been detained together with 16 inmates in a cell designed to fit ten people.

  The applicants repeatedly contacted numerous State officials both in person and in writing, complaining of the abduction and their beating and asking for help to find Ramzan.

In the judgment given on 29 June 1995, which concerned three cases, Lord Browne-Wilkinson held, among other things, that public policy considerations were such that local authorities should not be held

administration of the Republic of Ingushetia and departments of the interior and prosecutors’ offices at different levels, describing in detail the circumstances of Bashir’s abduction and asking for help

They also relied on the Land Registration Act 1925, which provided that, after the expiry of the 12-year period, the registered owner held the land in trust for the squatter.

The judge held that according to the information provided by the prison authorities there was no evidence that the applicant was not allowed to receive chocolate from his wife.

It held that it was admissible, and that the mayor’s decision was subject to judicial review.

    On appeal, the Regional Court held hearings on 4 July and 10   October 2002.

    Between 21 March and 19 May 2008 the County Court held four hearings in respect of the case.