The Court had doubts in the specific circumstances as to whether the applicants had had a legitimate expectation and therefore a “possession”.

With regard to the applicant’s statements, she had not argued that they had been part of a debate on a question of public interest, nor had she claimed to be an expert on the matter, a journalist or a

The first gunshot had come from the deceased.

had influenced the course of events.

Yet the national authorities, and in the final instance the Supreme Court, had dismissed the applicant’s claim on the ground that he had not proved that the seized items had disappeared or been damaged

Police officer S.T. had fired two warning shots, neither of which had had any deterrent effect on L.M.

In cases where the applicants had had at their disposal other accessible and effective avenues for their civil claims, it had found that their right of access to a court had not been infringed.

The doctor stated that the applicant had had several bruises on his thighs and chest. He had not had any visible injuries on his face or hands.

He had only become aware of them when he had received the court's decision.

When examining complaints made of a violation of the employees’ private lives after their employer had checked their computers, the domestic courts had followed the Court’s case-law and had had regard

The applicant had had no visible injuries.

Seeing this, other classmates had intervened and had kicked him, and an older pupil had then broken up the fight.

He had had a bruise on the face and had been limping.

Since there had been no lift at ZPH, to have access to fresh air he had had to climb the stairs to his cell on the second floor, which had been a risk to his health.

The insults to which the applicant had been subjected by R.V. had entailed his emotional disturbance, which had affected his psychological well-being, dignity and moral integrity.

At the sobering-up centre a breathalyser test had shown that the applicant had 0.34 mg of alcohol per litre of blood. He had been strapped to a bed as he had been aggressive.

The Constitutional Court’s decision and the subsequent legislative changes had had no impact on the proceedings in the applicant’s case; they had only come into force after those proceedings and had no

The Commission had concluded that the investigations had been both perfunctory and superficial and had not reflected any serious effort to discover what had really happened in the prison in September 1998

K.K. had no doubt that R.Z. had required an urgent blood transfusion. The patient had been transferred to another ward because his condition had deteriorated.