CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0914DEC000043809
14 septembre 2021
Besides the parties, prosecutors participated in those proceedings with the aim of defending public interests or interests of vulnerable persons.
Page 62 sur 217
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13441
19 octobre 2021
Her role and her duty consisted primarily in defending the professional interests of the members of that organisation, inter alia by making public pronouncements about the functioning of the judicial system
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0324DEC002501813
24 mars 2020
Depending on the nature of the case, court fees can be fixed or be calculated as a percentage of the value of the sum claimed.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148353
4 novembre 2014
The expert heard by the first instance court did not recommend therapeutic measures, but declared that he would re-consider them depending on the children’s developments during their puberty. 32.
ECLI:CEDH:001-182294
21 mars 2018
As a result, he had been forced to restrain himself and carefully weigh every word when defending his fundamental constitutional rights.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0928DEC005682700
28 septembre 2004
For the purpose of defending the free expression of every kind of thought, we who have signed as publishers, convey this 'convicted' text to the people, regardless of its contents and the question whether
Pôle 5 - Chambre 16
69e1cda2cdc6046d47896eed
16 avril 2026
The Claimant's claim to order the Respondent to get back money to Claimant the lump sum not inferior to USD 50.000,00 taxes included for corresponding to the Claimant's counsel fees for defending the Claimant's
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1107DEC001016302
7 novembre 2006
They could accept or refuse a name depending on how they applied in practice the principles derived from the Names Act.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1018DEC002163493
18 octobre 1995
This interpretation also did not affect the interests of the defending party as the applicant's request for legal aid had been communicated to them and they knew thereby that the applicant intended
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD006589316
24 octobre 2024
The applicant began defending himself and hit M.H. with a glass water bottle that he had just bought from the market. The applicant then left the scene of the incident.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC002789702
3 novembre 2005
However, the court may, depending on the circumstances, give a decision immediately. Under the case-law of the Supreme Court (decision no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD002955014
9 décembre 2025
proper notification, the Court accepts the applicant’s submissions that he had not been aware of the date and venue of the final cassation hearing and that this had prevented him from attending and defending
ECLI:CEDH:001-160650
15 janvier 2016
Depending on the poster, the slogan read either “They can give your vote to whom they want!” or “They can erase your vote!”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0525DEC002887005
25 mai 2010
In such cases, it is for the competent authority (depending on the suspect's status) to conduct the preliminary investigation and consequently to decide whether criminal proceedings should be opened.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0524JUD006394500
24 mai 2006
The relevant provisions of this Law provide: Section 1 “Actions and claims lodged before the courts ... shall be subject to stamp duty as provided for by law depending on whether or not the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC003307110
22 janvier 2013
However, the Court’s position may be subject to review in the future depending, in particular, on the domestic courts’ capacity to establish consistent case-law under the Remedy Act in line with the Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003808997
21 octobre 1998
The Commission recalls that, depending on the specific circumstances, the absence of reasons in a court decision might raise an issue as to the fairness of the procedure, in particular where
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0308DEC001335287
8 mars 1989
The applicant complains that the stopping of letters deprived him of adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence, prevented him from defending
ECLI:CEDH:001-116632
17 janvier 2013
their client was allowed on a case-by-case basis personally by the prosecutor in charge of the case, who was often absent from his office or unable to talk on the phone, which created impediments for defending
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0418JUD006512819
18 avril 2023
Both the applicant and the defending authorities appealed against that decision to the Timiș County Court, which overturned it in a final decision of 23 May 2019; the court dismissed