On 21 March 1990 the applicant applied to the Minister of the Interior to have the deportation order rescinded.

Ltd, porta plainte contre eux – ils étaient alors mari et femme – pour banqueroute frauduleuse et diverses autres infractions.

France , 25 March 1999, § 51, Reports 1999-II).

#0069d6 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 73696/13 HÁLÓZATI GYÓGYSZERTÁRAK SZÖVETSÉGE AND OTHERS against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 11   March

, avocat au barreau de SAINTES COMPOSITION DE LA COUR : L'affaire a été débattue le 17 Mars 2022, en audience publique, devant la Cour composée de : M.

This decision was served after 11 March 2005. THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 13.

France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series   A no.   200, p.   19, §   36).

Italie (n o 43961/09, déc., 24   mars 2015). a)     Les données concernant l’impact environnemental de l’usine à partir de 2001 En 2001, le registre INES (Inventaire national des émissions

Georgia (dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022) and merits of these complaints.

    By a judgment of 1 March 2010 the Slavonski Brod County Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment.

    On 30 March 2006 the Pest County Regional Administrative Office instructed the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Water Management to make an offer to expropriate the land.

    By a decision of 25 March 2003, the Court declared the application partly admissible. 7.

795/20 Artem Dmitriyevich TYURIN against Russia and 21 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 March

composed of:   Lətif Hüseynov , President ,   Ivana Jelić,   Erik Wennerström , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 21 March

A l'issue de la visite médicale de reprise du 18 mars 2014, M. [K] [Z] a été déclaré apte à son poste par le médecin du travail. Le 19 mars 2014, M.

    Subsequently the Budapest V District Police Department fined each applicant 80,000 Hungarian forints (HUF) (approximately 250 euros) for the regulatory offence of abusing the right to peaceful

    On 17 March 2014 the Szolnok District Court declared the judgment of the Venice Minors Court (see paragraph 18 above) enforceable.

On 1 March 1999 K., accompanied by I.T., made a declaration before the Budapest Administrative Office.

    The court ordered Irodalom Kft to pay 1,000,000 Hungarian forints   (HUF) (approximately 3,500 euros (EUR)) in respect of the article published in Élet és Irodalom .