CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

13 830 résultats pour « Guilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-170889

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2017

11 janvier 2017

    By a judgment of 25 October 2010 the Tbilisi City Court found the applicant guilty of three counts of trading in influence (Article 339(1) of the Criminal Code of Georgia). 4.

Source officielle

Page 61 sur 692

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0412JUD004638799

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2005

12 avril 2005

He pleaded not guilty and the hearing was adjourned. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0530JUD004506617

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2023

30 mai 2023

However, Mesić will continue to manipulate [by using] this [and] by saying that no one has been accusing him of anything and that therefore he cannot even be guilty, and that his guilt has not been proven

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD007847711

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2017

19 décembre 2017

    On 26 October 2007 the Paris special Assize Court, composed of seven professional judges, found the applicant guilty as charged in connection with the three attacks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177584

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2017

11 septembre 2017

The Tverskoy Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to a fine of RUB 1,000.

Source officielle
CA

1ère chambre

64c35c5cf01612d969deff63

Appel

27 juillet 2023

27 juillet 2023

SOCIETE MARSEILLAISE DE CRÉDIT SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE Grosse délivrée le 27/07/2023 à Me Joris NUMA à Me Céline GUILLE COUR D'APPEL DE NÎMES CHAMBRE CIVILE 1ère

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD005589610

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2021

11 mars 2021

P. pleaded guilty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0826DEC005949300

Admin. suprême

26 août 2003

26 août 2003

Counsel for the accused applied to the judge to enter a verdict of not guilty according to section 17 of the 1967 Act.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919DEC003543697

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2000

19 septembre 2000

On 31 January 1997 the Regional Court found the applicant guilty for having forged tax documents and having suborned a witness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1010JUD006173008

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2019

10 octobre 2019

During the trial the applicant retracted the admission of guilt he had made during the investigation and pleaded not guilty, stating that he had not assaulted the two police officers who, he alleged, had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0909DEC003266102

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2008

9 septembre 2008

On 21 December 2000 the trial court once more found the applicant guilty of the offence of membership of an illegal organisation and sentenced him to twelve years and six months’ imprisonment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-81529

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2007

20 juin 2007

with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent state was to pay to each of the ten applicants as just satisfaction, within three months, 1 000 Dutch guilders

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-199379

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2019

19 novembre 2019

Removal proceedings 3 November 2017 - the Frunzenskiy District Court of Ivanovo found the applicant guilty of violating migration regulations and fined him;   11 June 2019 - the Leninskiy District

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51733

Admin. suprême

14 février 2000

14 février 2000

with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay to each of the ten applicants as just satisfaction, within three months, 1 000 Dutch guilders

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1025REP003509597

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 1999

25 octobre 1999

  The applicant was found guilty of two counts of conduct to the prejudice of good order and military discipline contrary to section 69 of the 1955 Act.

Source officielle
TCOM

4ème chambre

69e9c5c8cdc6046d4739ae09

Commerce

9 octobre 2025

9 octobre 2025

TRIBUNAL DES ACTIVITES ECONOMIQUES DE NANTERRE JUGEMENT PRONONCE LE 9 Octobre 2025 4ème CHAMBRE DEMANDEURS Mme [Y] [W] [Adresse 1] comparant par Me Philippe GUILLUY [Adresse 2] M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186946

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2018

20 septembre 2018

’s complaint under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention as regards the statements given to the press by the police during the criminal proceedings against the applicant indicating that the applicant was guilty

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203740

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2020

19 juin 2020

On 3   October 2017 the Kanash District Court of the Chuvashiya Republic found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to three years’ imprisonment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10749

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2015

12 novembre 2015

They therefore amounted to a clear declaration that the applicant was guilty of burglary before he had been proved guilty by the competent trial court in a final judgment in accordance with the law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209DEC003842806

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2014

9 décembre 2014

On 20   June 2007 the Pskov Town Court found the applicant guilty of several counts of robbery and sentenced him to four years’ imprisonment.

Source officielle