CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228JUD005281699
28 février 2002
Forgione, avocat à Solopaca (Bénévent). Le gouvernement italien (« le Gouvernement ») est représenté par son agent, M. U. Leanza, et par son coagent, M. V.
Page 61 sur 114
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228JUD005281799
Forgione, avocat à Solopaca (Bénévent). Le gouvernement italien (« le Gouvernement ») est représenté par son agent, M. U. Leanza, et par son coagent, M. V. Esposito. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228JUD005109599
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228JUD005282699
1ère Chambre
62c7c997cb8dca058e3e7941
7 juillet 2022
Représentés par la SCP GERIGNY & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de BOURGES timbre fiscal acquitté APPELANTS suivant déclaration du 05/07/2021 II - Mme [G] [V] épouse [K] née le 17 Février 1947 à ST FORGEOT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0706DEC004123798
6 juillet 2000
They alleged, inter alia , that the document produced by G.C. and D.C., containing the promise to sell the shares, was a forgery.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3251159-3645099
16 septembre 2010
A former district police officer, Mr Baloga complained about the excessive length of criminal proceedings brought against him for abuse of authority and forgery.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111125
18 avril 2012
From 28 October 2010 to 14 September 2011 the applicant served a sentence of imprisonment after his conviction of forgery of a Russian passport with which he had lived on the territory of Russia under
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-163071
4 mai 2016
In 2003 the defendants were convicted of forgery and negligent bookkeeping and acquitted of the rest of the charges.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0514DEC004207898
14 mai 2002
They were convicted of forgery. On 10 October 2001 judgment was given in the criminal proceedings against a court expert. He was convicted of giving false testimony in the civil proceedings.
ECLI:CEDH:003-3182669-3555537
6 juillet 2010
Arrested in March 1998 and released in June 2009 after serving a sentence for bribery, embezzlement, forgery and smuggling, Mr Dimakos complained about the conditions of his detention in the various
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614JUD003118107
14 juin 2011
The applicant was arrested on 5 October 2000 on suspicion of having committed several counts of fraud and forgery of private documents. 6.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-703060-711932
18 février 2003
In a judgment of 26 June 1993 the Criminal Division of the Audiencia Nacional found the applicant guilty of drug trafficking, unauthorised currency transfers and forgery of public documents, sentenced
ECLI:CEDH:001-233696
15 avril 2024
On 30 October 2014 the charges brought against the applicant were amended and new charges were brought against her under Articles 178 § 3 (1), 325 § 1 (forgery) and 349 §
ECLI:CEDH:001-121063
13 mai 2013
2004 the Arad Tax Office lodged a criminal complaint against the applicant, the administrator and son of the beneficiary (who was also involved in the running of the company) for fiscal evasion and forgery
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0722JUD005252999
22 juillet 2003
On 16 June 1998 the District Court ( käräjäoikeus, tingsrätten ) of Vantaa convicted the applicant of aggravated concealment of stolen goods and aggravated forgery, sentencing him to one
ECLI:CEDH:003-972307-1004841
6 avril 2004
On 9 October and 21 November 1989 he lodged criminal complaints against two company directors for forgery of documents.
ECLI:CEDH:001-108553
2 décembre 2011
The Bessenyei case concerns the violation of the applicant’s freedom of movement due to the withdrawal of his passport from 25 June 2001 until 1 July 2003, because criminal charges on forgery of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD000917221
14 janvier 2025
July 2018, as part of the criminal proceedings in which evidence obtained by means of the secret surveillance orders was used, the Zrenjanin High Court found the applicant guilty of abuse of office, forgery
cr
6079a87f9ba5988459c4d88a
16 mai 2001
point, l'article 427 invoqué est parfaitement étranger à l'exception et ne concerne que la conviction du juge qui, s'agissant d'une infraction dont la preuve peut être rapportée par tous moyens, la forgera