It therefore finds that the interference pursued the legitimate aim of “prevention of disorder or crime”, that is, of preserving order in the armed forces (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8 &

The difference between deprivation of and restriction upon liberty is one of degree or intensity, and not of nature or substance (see Engel and Others v.

    The Court’s established case-law sets out three criteria, commonly known as the “Engel criteria” (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , 8   June 1976, Series A no. 22), to be considered

    In comparable cases involving the imposition of tax surcharges, the Court has held, on the basis of the “Engel criteria” (that is, the legal classification under domestic law, the nature

In a letter in reply dated 4 October 2006, the director of one of those establishments at the material time (Mr Engels) said that there was no register recording pupils on the basis of their nationality

Court H.R., Engel and Others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 23, para. 54).   46.

    The Court reiterates that the assessment of the applicability of Article   6 under its   criminal   limb is based on three criteria, commonly known as the “Engel criteria”

Of course, the freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 (art. 10) applies to servicemen just as it does to other persons within the jurisdiction of the Contracting States (see the Engel and Others

    As to the criminal limb, the Government submitted that the proceedings were not “criminal” within the autonomous meaning of the Convention (they referred to Engel and Others v.

    In the light of the above-mentioned [ Engel ] criteria, the Constitutional Court concludes that disciplinary proceedings against judges of general courts are not proceedings for the determination

D.H. arrêt Engel et autres du 8 juin 1976, série A n° 22, p. 32, par. 77).

  Court H.R., Engel and Others judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A No. 22) the Commission finds that such transfer decisions contain no elements which could make the applicant the object of a criminal

au sens de l'article 5, il faut partir de sa situation concrète et prendre en compte un ensemble de critères, comme le genre, la durée et les modalités de l'exécution de la mesure considérée (arrêts Engel

Engel and others, judgment of 8.6.1976).

the attendance and examination of every witness on the accused’s behalf: its essential aim, as is indicated by the words ‘under the same conditions’, is a full ‘equality of arms’ in the matter” (see Engel

liberté au sens de l’article 5, il faut partir de sa situation concrète et prendre en compte un ensemble de critères, comme le genre, la durée et les modalités de l’exécution de la mesure considérée ( Engel

En outre, la liste que renferme l’article 14 revêt un caractère indicatif et non limitatif (voir Engel   et autres c. Pays-Bas , arrêt du 8 juin 1976, série   A n o   22, p.

  54, §   19, l’arrêt Engel et autres c.   Allemagne du 8   juin 1976, série   A n°   22, p.

Court H.R., Engel and Others judgment, loc. cit.; Öztürk judgment of 21 February 1984, Series A no. 73, pp. 18-20, paras. 50-53; Weber judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, pp. 17-18, paras. 30- 35