Decides, having regard to the information supplied by the Government of the United Kingdom, that no further action is called for in these cases.    

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 21   October 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

Article 6 (art. 6) of the Convention;   Whereas the Commission expresses the opinion that in this case there is no violation of the Convention;   Considering that the Committee of Ministers is called

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15   January 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 11 April 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 3 September 1998 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is now therefore called

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 21   October 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

The applicant’s complaints under Article 7 of the Convention concerning his criminal conviction of unlawful distribution of pornography for selling DVDs containing the so-called “hentai” cartoons were

decided to refuse the request, introduced by the Government on 15 September 2000, to revise and/or rectify the judgment of 27 July 2000; Whereas, as a consequence, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Protocol No. 9 but   that the screening panel of the Court decided on 16   May 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 15   January 1997 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

accordance with Protocol No. 9 but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 3 September 1998 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is now therefore called

Accordingly, the judges in question had never had to assess the merits of the charge against the applicant and had been called upon to examine different points of law in each appeal.

Decides that no further action is called for in these cases.    

suspectată sau acuzată în pofida eforturilor rezonabile depuse de autoritățile competente – Posibilitatea unui proces și a unei condamnări în lipsă – Articolul 9 – Dreptul la un nou proces sau la o altă cale

A partir du chemin des Calades, traverser la parcelle CK 84 (BRUNO) en longeant sa limite Sud avec la parcelle CK 109 (hors cause) pour rejoindre le chemin des Amandiers.

    I.Zh., who had a brother called D.Zh., said that D.Zh.’s nickname was Shuaip.

However, no change of case-law can be seen in that decision, and the applicant has not shown today in what respect such a change would be called for ...” II.

  6, M.P., was called to help them. 9.

The legal framework for the so-called strutture temporanee , better known as CAS centres is set out in Article 11 of the Legislative Decree 142/2015.