CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

15 535 résultats pour « Alma Basic »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD002833807

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2018

4 septembre 2018

Accordingly, they invited the Court to either reject the applicant’s complaint or to hold that there had been no violation on that basis. 36.

Page 61 sur 777

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628JUD003654903

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2007

28 juin 2007

In sum, the Government’s assertion that the evidence obtained under torture was not used as a basis for the applicant’s conviction contradicted the circumstances of the case. 57.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD003798609

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2014

7 janvier 2014

factual basis. 56.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1116JUD000761015

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2021

16 novembre 2021

disregarded on the basis that it had encroached on lawyer-client privilege.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005311420

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2023

13 juin 2023

The court dismissed, inter alia, the applicant’s assertion that no criminal case was pending against him in Russia.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1725364-1815296

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2006

11 juillet 2006

  Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 La Rosa and Alba v. Italy (No. 5) (no. 63239/00)   Maselli v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1107JUD000996814

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2024

7 novembre 2024

  66644/01, 2   December   2004) and Coggiola and Alba v. Italy ((dec.), no.   28513/02, 24   February   2005). 15 .     Law no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601DEC005485700

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2004

1 juin 2004

The applicants maintained, inter alia , that their company had been dissolved in 1992 because of the bank's failure to fulfil its contractual obligations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC004336998

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2005

3 mai 2005

He also considered that the applicant lacked even basic knowledge about the opposition group of which he had allegedly been a member.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0712JUD003307196

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2001

12 juillet 2001

He invoked inter alia Articles 36 and 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Listina základních práv a svobod) . 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD000340910

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2021

22 juillet 2021

    The applicant appealed, raising, inter alia , the following arguments.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405JUD001814702

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2007

5 avril 2007

    On 8 December 2000 the Nikulinskiy District Court of Moscow gave judgment, finding that the Justice Department's decision of 28 January 2000 had not had any basis in law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011DEC000314516

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2016

11 octobre 2016

The court found that the applicants were able adequately to take care of X’s basic daily needs. However, as a vulnerable child, X had a special need for contact and emotional interaction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1128DEC004767999

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2000

28 novembre 2000

He stated, inter alia , that he could only be prosecuted for the one offence of irregular operations with currency and securities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1214DEC001301387

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 1988

14 décembre 1988

  The basic principle was that the assets were assessed, with certain exceptions, at their book value.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1008DEC001792591

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 1991

8 octobre 1991

THUNE              Sir   Basil HALL              Mr.   F.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0118DEC004296998

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2005

18 janvier 2005

, such as the basis of custom "from time immemorial".

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306JUD005957708

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2012

6 mars 2012

He pointed out that audio recordings had been made on the basis of that authorisation on 14 and 29 June and 5 July 2005.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD000064908

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

Many were tried in haste and convicted before October 2003, when legal reforms took place giving defendants the right to appeal their conviction on the basis of the facts ...”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-242689

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2025

10 mars 2025

Maria Caterina ITA 1967 565 BASILE Giovanni ITA 1957 566 BASILE Simona ITA 1969 567 BASILE Annamaria ITA 1957 568 BASILE Elisabetta ITA 1964 569 BASILICATA Lanfranco ITA 1960 570 BASILICO Rossana ITA

Source officielle