A   person who has been granted asylum in Russia because of possible political persecution in the State seeking his extradition may not be extradited to that State (Article 464 § 1 (2)). 35.

He further noted that it was in any case unclear from the relevant documents (which had been made available to him subsequently) whether the said ConEC meeting had taken place on 25 or 29 October, because

He refused his extradition under Article   244 ‑ 2   (1) because Kyrgyz Community was not banned in Russia.

SERVIZIO TRASPORTI COMBINATI (STC) [Adresse 1] [Adresse 2]) Représentant : Me Philippe CHATEAUNEUF, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 643 - N° du dossier 2018040 Représentant : Me Belaid

Greece, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Ledi Bianku,   Kristina Pardalos,   Linos-Alexandre

He also maintained that because of the inadequate temperature in his cell, there were traces of damp on the walls.

However, Article 5 § 1 (e) did not permit the detention of a person simply because his views or behaviour deviated from the norms prevailing in society.

It is not enough that the members of the group are targeted because they belong to that group, that is because the perpetrator has a discriminatory intent. Something more is required.

  The applicant joined the British Army in 1980 when he became a member of the Scots Guards.

No appeal having been lodged, the judgment became final. 12.

20, 8591/20, 21631/20 and 14499/21, the Government raised a preliminary objection concerning the loss of victim status by the applicants for the periods of detention specified in the appended table because

20, 21889/20, 28390/20 and 38212/20, the Government raised a preliminary objection concerning the loss of victim status by the applicants for the periods of detention specified in the appended table because

  Mr Mežnarić complained that he did not have a fair hearing before an impartial tribunal because his constitutional complaint was decided by a panel of judges which included a judge who had represented

However, because of the 1974 Turkish intervention this did not happen.

It further held that the principle had always been that the constitutional and civil competencies also had to remain separate even because they had different procedural rules and lead to remedies which

March 2014 a Chamber of the First Section, to which the case had been allocated (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court), composed of Isabelle Berro, President, Khanlar Hajiyev, Julia Laffranque, Linos-Alexandre

The agreement was approved by Brno Municipal Court on 11   December 2002 and its judgment became final.

xa0; December 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 5   January 2016 as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Linos-Alexandre