CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930JUD006781010
30 septembre 2014
THE LAW THE GOVERNMENT’S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION A. The Government’s submissions to the Grand Chamber 19.
Page 60 sur 11941
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0211JUD003168096
11 février 2003
Preliminary objection rejected (exhaustion);Violation of P1-1;Pecuniary damage - financial award
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4575
27 novembre 2003
Law: Preliminary objection (non-exhaustion) – The Court notes, in particular, that according to the evidence before it, the applicant’s complaint, together with an application to join in the proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1013JUD006329600
13 octobre 2005
Preliminary objection joined to merits;Violation of P1-1;Just satisfaction reserved
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0703JUD003874697
3 juillet 2003
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion);Violation of P1-1;Just satisfaction reserved
ECLI:CEDH:002-4046
11 janvier 2005
within the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction to fill the legal vacuum revealed by this case, by means of an interpretation that complied with the Constitution and took account of the Act’s spirit and objective
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-374
17 octobre 2011
Preliminary objections joined to the merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);Admissible
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1017DEC006064208
The Court concludes that this objection of the Serbian and Slovenian Governments must thus be dismissed. C. Jurisdiction ratione personae and ratione loci 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1127JUD006543601
THE GOVERNMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION A. The parties' submissions 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0331JUD000642807
31 mars 2011
Therefore, the Court dismisses the Government's objection as to the applicant's victim status. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115JUD005838600
15 novembre 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327JUD002954904
27 mars 2008
No objections were raised as to the accepted claims.
ECLI:CEDH:002-373
The Court therefore dismissed the Governments’ objections concerning incompatibility ratione materiae .
ECLI:CEDH:002-10166
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-3 - Abuse of the right of petition)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215JUD000082103
15 décembre 2009
The Government's preliminary objection 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD001410202
10 avril 2012
THE GOVERNMENT’S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION A. The parties’ arguments 19.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1210
Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Art. 10
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0114JUD005452200
14 janvier 2010
THE GOVERNMENT’S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION 39. The Government reiterated their objection as to admissibility, which had previously been rejected by the Court (see Kotov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0715JUD000813078
15 juillet 1982
Eckle from the courtroom on grounds of his behaviour before the Court and, in answer to an objection raised by one of the co-defendants, affirmed its jurisdiction in the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115JUD005657800