THE FACTS 3.     The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1937 and lives in Gola Prystan, Ukraine.

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant, S.S.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

hearing Bus driver found guilty of causing road accident in proceedings in which he was not involved: Article   6 applicable; violation Facts – In 2009 the applicant, a bus driver, was involved in

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.     The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Skopje. 7.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS 3.     The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.

Having regard to the fact that it heard the bailiff who had authored both reports, of 24 January and 1 April 2006, the Court does not discern any indication of bad faith as such in that decision of the

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.

    The applicants maintained that their right to a fair hearing by a   tribunal had been breached.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Mineralnyye Vody. 5.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. Background of the case 6.

    The applicant complained before the Court that his right to a fair trial guaranteed under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention had been breached, as   he had not been informed of the hearing

Despite the fact that he had become aware of the proceedings only when he was arrested, he had been refused the possibility to have the proceedings reopened ab initio .

, such as a friendly relationship between the applicant and K., rather than the fact that she had committed a breach of ethics.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)