CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1024JUD003824412
24 octobre 2024
The BCEA offered to make the payments, not in compensation for expropriation but on the basis of contracts of sale to be entered into by the residents and one of two individuals, R.K. and Z.I., who were
Page 60 sur 65
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD005398917
11 juillet 2024
Some applicants also made additional complaints under Articles 6, 10 and 13 of the Convention related to the searches or their consequences.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1201JUD002057808
1 décembre 2016
In other words, the risk of any mistake made by the State authority must be borne by the State and the errors must not be remedied at the expense of the individual concerned (see Gladysheva , cited above
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0419JUD003318808
19 avril 2011
08) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Ms Valentina
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0916JUD000110014
16 septembre 2021
The Court considers that it has already addressed the main legal questions raised in the present applications, and that there is no need to make a separate assessment of the admissibility
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0916JUD005374709
It further considers that it is not necessary to make an assessment of the admissibility and merits of the remainder of the complaints raised by Mr S.
Première Chambre
69d6c928cdc6046d4791d2b9
8 avril 2026
N° RG 22/03126 - N° Portalis DBZT-W-B7G-F3KP TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE VALENCIENNES PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE Affaire n° N° RG 22/03126 - N° Portalis DBZT-W-B7G-F3KP N° minute : 26/88 Code NAC : 28A LG/AFB
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321JUD005214212
21 mars 2017
Court has already ruled that the next-of-kin or heir may in principle pursue the application, provided that he or she has sufficient interest in the case (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0324DEC001490811
24 mars 2020
A request concerning his HIV status was made by the SIZO. 14. On 1 March 2010 B. complained to the SIZO staff of a cough and weakness.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD005651615
13 novembre 2025
where an applicant dies during the examination of a case, his or her heirs or close relatives may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0704JUD002475110
4 juillet 2019
that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility and merits of the other complaints mentioned in the preceding paragraph (see, for example, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD005478416
10 novembre 2022
: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1102JUD001422818
2 novembre 2023
56493/22 (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, ECHR 2014; Aleksandr Andreyev v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122JUD001201816
22 janvier 2019
has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0511JUD003942216
11 mai 2023
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224300
30 mars 2023
1829/18* 11/12/2017 Grigoriy Sergeyevich KOLOVERTNOV 1992 Valentin Valentinovich Pyshkin St Petersburg 12/06/2017, 2.10 p.m. 13/06/2017, 4.30 p.m., when the trial on the administrative offence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD008364117
27 juin 2024
Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the victim made
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0504JUD003921007
4 mai 2017
An application for supervisory review may only be lodged in cases that were heard by a first-instance court and where no appeal was made because of circumstances outside the parties’ control, or in which
PAC - Contentieux
6a15f084cdc6046d4706393b
21 mai 2026
96 boulevard de l’Europe - Immeuble La Commanderie 76100 ROUEN représenté par Maître Alexandre MAÂT, avocat au barreau de ROUEN, vestiaire : 111 Monsieur [A] [C] [U] [L] né le 02 Avril 1981 à VALENCIENNES
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0603JUD000359217
3 juin 2025
It further noted that conducting such proceedings required the revocation of the order discharging the applicant from military service – a decision that could only be made by the Chairperson of the Supreme