His motion for bias against the police authority dealing with the case was dismissed, and his ensuing complaint, filed on 3   December 2004, does not appear to have been answered. 10.

    By the final interlocutory judgment of 3 June 2004 the Iaşi District Court inter alia also dismissed the applicant’s lawyer’s motion to allow him to find the location of the witness I.I.C

In the course of the proceedings the court considered the applicant’s detention on remand regularly, either on its own motion or upon the request of the applicant and each time it ordered his continued

La CME a elle-même adopté, à l'unanimité, une motion le 12 septembre 2022, qui met en cause les choix de la direction concernant le périmètre insuffisant de sécurisation de l'établissement, la gestion

In January 1992 the Regional Court dismissed the applicant's motion to challenge the District Court for bias.

To this end, the presiding judge rules on the motions of the parties.

On 20 November 2002 the Commercial Division of the Kraków District Court instituted of its own motion proceedings against the applicant for failure to comply with the insolvency procedure.

né le 01 Janvier 1950 à SOURBIRE (MALI) ... 69100 VILLEURBANNE représenté par Me Annick DE FOURCROY, avoué à la Cour assisté de Me Bernard MOMPOINT, avocat au barreau de LYON INTIMEE :

née le 24 Février 1967 à STRASBOURG (67000) ... 44470 CARQUEFOU Représentée par Me Emilie MOUSSION, avocat au barreau de Nantes Monsieur Erwan X... est appelant, selon déclaration du 13 juin 2014

This motion was dismissed by the Graz Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) on 31   January 1994.

    On 25 March 2003 the applicant company filed a motion for exemption from court fees.

Such a motion can be submitted by a person who has a legal interest in having her or his rights or obligations registered.

before the Regensburg Regional Court following the remittal of the case to it, the applicant lodged numerous motions for bias against the three judges of the court, and in particular a motion for bias

Les victimes ont demandé à la juridiction américaine de faire application du droit français et CAPITALES TOURS a présenté une motion de « forum non conveniens » au motif que le litige n'intéressait plus

Further, the applicant claimed that the alleged lack of impartiality had been clearly visible due to the judge’s refusal to examine the applicant’s motions for evidence.

The court dismissed the motion, finding that these allegations were completely unfounded.

On 9 September 1998 the Regional Court, having heard the expert, once again dismissed the motion for bias.

On 10 July 2001 the applicant requested the court to give a decision on her motions. 31.

He then issued a variety of cross-motions against the Plaintiffs.

    At the hearing the City Court examined and dismissed the applicant company’s motion of 23 April 2004.