The second applicant had been held liable for making the offending statements.

#xa0; January 1995 and by the Government of the United Kingdom on 23 and 26 January 1995;         Whereas in its judgment of 10 June 1996 the Court:         _ held

On 12 December 1996 the court held the first hearing. At the second hearing held on 13 January 1997 the trial court ordered an expert opinion.

that the derogation made by Turkey under Article 15 of the Convention was not applicable in the case; - held, that there has been no breach of Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention as regards the

The applicant delivered blows with his fist, mostly to her head, and also beat her with his shoes on the back of her head. He then stubbed out a cigarette on her left breast.

    On 8   November 1996 the Warsaw Regional Court held a hearing.

The claims of all plaintiffs were dismissed on the ground that they had never paid any sums directly to the LenGESS. 16.

The claims of all plaintiffs were dismissed on the ground that they had never paid any sums directly to the LenGESS. 15.

On 29 September 1975 the amount of compensation for the expropriation was blocked in the Diyarbakır Central Bank, but the applicant never received this sum. 7.

In the absence of a claim by the applicants for reimbursement of costs and expenses, the Court made no award under that head. 5.

    On 13   March   2000 the court held a hearing.

  placed a plastic bag over his head, closing off his access to air, while M. held him down.

On 7   September 1993 they were bound over to keep the peace and to be of good behaviour in the sum of £100.

  ***   After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. A decision on admissibility - and, if appropriate, a judgment will be delivered at a later date.

On 30 June 2008 the applicant company sought before the Ankara 1 st   Commercial Court a global sum of 100,000,000 Turkish Liras   (TRY) against a creditor bank for all pecuniary, non-pecuniary

  The gardeners paid the required sum for the land to the Slovak Land Fund. The applicant community of land owners received 1.4097 hectares of different land in compensation on 1 October 2002.

In the summer of 1990 her former husband took the children to the United States. In September he failed to present them to their mother so that she could exercise her visiting rights.

misappropriation of public funds: inadmissible Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Failure to appear of key witness, a foreign national living abroad: inadmissible Until 1993 the applicant was the head

The second applicant suffers from phimosis and has developed an inflammation. No paediatrician was available in the SIZO.