The Court of Appeal adjourned the hearing sine die . 15 .

Article 155: Court hearing “Civil cases shall be examined in a hearing upon mandatory provision of information to the parties about the time and place of the hearing.”

The list of cases, scheduled for a hearing in cassation shall be made public not later than a day before the hearing takes place.”

.) - 57795/00 Decision 25.11.2003 [Section IV] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Oral hearing Lack of oral hearing in proceedings concerning revocation of firearms licence: inadmissible

In view of the amount involved, the case was referred for hearing by way of arbitration.

The applicant was notified of the date for the first MAT hearing on 31   July 1992 and the hearing commenced on 4 September 1992.

       On 13 July 1994 the hearing took place before the District Court. The applicant did not attend the hearing but was represented by Mr.

had been no fair hearing were unfounded.

The hearing on the application was held on 13 January 1994. Following this hearing, the parties agreed to set aside the referee’s report and to appoint an arbitrator by agreement.

so supplied (Children's Hearings rules, Rule 19(2)(a).

The applicant and her lawyer were present at the hearing. 8.     The applicant’s husband appealed.

At a hearing held on 23 December 1999 the applicant asked the trial court to be exempted from the obligation to participate in the hearings, arguing that it would be difficult for him to attend the trial

be brought to the hearing from prison. 4.

Was he duly informed of the hearing held by the Bursa Assize Court on 19 September 2006?

Law : The personal attendance of the defendant at an appeal hearing did not have the same crucial significance as at trial.

The absence of personal contact with the applicant at the hearing and the absence of any discussion with him in advance of the hearing, combined with the fact that she had had to plead the case on the

The applicant requested an oral hearing and that a tax inspector as well as an expert appointed by the applicant be heard as witnesses.

    The Court reiterates that the entitlement to a “public hearing” in Article 6 § 1 necessarily implies a right to an “oral hearing”.

As regards the lack of an oral hearing before the Court of Appeal, the Government point out that there was an oral hearing before the District Court.