had been made on behalf of the accused with the (named) applicants so that the prison term to which the accused had been condemned be reduced by four years in return for money; that judgment had been

Law : The circumstances where a religious organisation had been in apparent conflict with the leadership of the church to which it had been affiliated, had required an extremely sensitive, neutral approach

Moreover, the fact that the applicant had not been told the reasons for his dismissal had in itself ruled out any possibility of adversarial debate.

However, the applicants had not shown that the third applicant’s mother had had sufficient means to buy the flat, since she had had no declared income between 1997 and 2008.

The applicant had received about one kilogram and had gone to the restaurant, where he had been arrested. 16.

The doctors’ application to the duty judge had contained very limited, but also inaccurate, information as it had stated that the applicant had rejected “all types of treatment” and that her refusal had

She had insisted with the authorities that a murder investigation be conducted, claiming that her husband had been tortured. The Public Prosecutor had only taken a statement from her a month later.

Such a significant-flaw test, while understandable in the context of investigations, had no meaningful role in an assessment as to whether the respondent State had had in place an adequate legal framework

Although the applicant had suggested that the election results had been rigged and were unfair, he had not lodged a complaint under Article   3 of Protocol No.   1.

But the fact remained that after M. had changed his version of events the charge had been dropped, the investigation had been closed and he had been released from detention pending trial.

not had a fair trial as it had been ordered to pay penalty payments in competition law proceedings on the basis of hearsay evidence but without being able to examine or have examined the persons at the

On the other hand, he had repeatedly stated before the trial court that he had not done anything wrong.

The applicants had been able to respond to her opinion in writing and orally at the hearing at which she had been examined.

The Government had submitted that, given that it had been necessary to secure compliance with the principle, the domestic authorities had had a justified reason for not implementing the effective criminal-law

Their commander had shouted a warning and then one or two warning shots had been fired into the air but the members of the group had started fleeing.

However, the applicant had merely argued that there was no evidence which would have indicated that she had been the driver at the time when her car had been recorded exceeding the speed limit.

Nor had the term of 20   years’ imprisonment imposed in 1993/1995 –   and which the applicant had fully served   – been re-examined.

to act once the investigation had commenced.