Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226263
10 juillet 2023
10 juillet 2023
account that the first group of applicants were acquitted of the charge of participation in a mafia-type criminal organisation, did the decisions of the domestic courts reflect the opinion that they were guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158449
6 octobre 2015
6 octobre 2015
By a decision of 4 August 2006 the Disciplinary Board, after having examined the case materials related to all three sets of disciplinary proceedings jointly, found the applicant guilty of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC002994907
22 juin 2010
22 juin 2010
Failure to mention a fact cannot, on its own, prove guilt. But depending on the circumstances you may hold it against a defendant when deciding whether he is guilty.
Source officielle4ème chambre commerciale
6350e4e442150aadff23dba0
19 octobre 2022
19 octobre 2022
TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE NIMES 16 décembre 2021 RG : Organisme FONDS COMMUN DE TITRISATION ORNUS C/ [W] [W] Grosse délivrée le 19 octobre 2022 à : - Me Céline GUILLE
Source officielleciv1
613722d8cd580146774023ae
4 mars 1997
4 mars 1997
Michel Y..., demeurant "Résidence Rochebelle", ..., 10°/ de la société Le Guil du Luberon, (M.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0320DEC001845007
20 mars 2012
20 mars 2012
according to law whereas the conclusions of the BIBOB Agency and subsequent decisions of the administrative body were not intended to establish anyone’s guilt of a criminal offence. 24.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD003869702
8 janvier 2009
8 janvier 2009
He pleaded not guilty on two other counts.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-860155-882240
28 octobre 2003
28 octobre 2003
Mr Baars claimed a total of 205,000 Netherlands guilders (NLG) for reimbursement of costs and expenses he incurred during the criminal proceedings against him and for pecuniary and non-pecuniary
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222DEC002043492
22 février 1995
22 février 1995
He contends that the reasons for the refusal indicated that the court had already determined the question of guilt and thereby also showed bias towards him.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0303REP002699995
3 mars 1999
3 mars 1999
As he thereby displayed a lack of consciousness of guilt, only part of the sentence was suspended on probation. 32.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003236696
1 juillet 1998
1 juillet 1998
, and, pursuant to Article 423 para. 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, determined the sentence for the misdemeanours of which the applicant had been found guilty by the Magistrate at a fine of 2,500
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD001436406
17 décembre 2013
17 décembre 2013
On 20 December 2004 it found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to twenty-three years in prison. 10. The defendants appealed.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3032230-3367081
26 février 2010
26 février 2010
At the close of proceedings conducted under the 1982 Procedure Act as applicable to minors, he was found guilty of the charges against him and placed in a reformatory for six years.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD002390615
23 octobre 2025
23 octobre 2025
The applicant and T. had both pleaded not guilty.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0516DEC003854597
16 mai 2000
16 mai 2000
266-A), it held that it was not the refusal of a claim for compensation which was contrary to the Convention, but the re-examination of the question of guilt after a final acquittal.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1210JUD006454317
10 décembre 2024
10 décembre 2024
On 28 March 2016 the Topolovgrad District Court, sitting at first instance, found the applicant guilty as charged.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1039
18 mars 2010
18 mars 2010
The comments in question, including a promise to arrest the applicant, could well have been construed as confirming his belief that the applicant was guilty of the alleged offence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC002243705
6 octobre 2009
6 octobre 2009
In a judgment of 4 November 2002 the Burgas Regional Court found him guilty as charged, sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment and ordered him to pay, inter alia , the amount of 909.90 Bulgarian levs
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9462
22 mai 2014
22 mai 2014
Article 6 § 2: The Court had consistently emphasised the importance of the choice of words by public officials in their statements before a person had been tried and found guilty of a particular criminal
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238257
28 octobre 2024
28 octobre 2024
On 26 June 2019 [1] , the appellate court substituted that conviction for a lesser offence, finding the applicant guilty, in his capacity as a public official, of an attempt to secure an advantage in a
Source officiellePage 60 sur 692
GUILLYBASSANS
12/07/2026
Voir →
SCI PLAISANCE-GUILLY
01/04/2026
Voir →
LE GUILLY PEINTURE
21/11/2025
Voir →
GUILLY ENERGIES
11/11/2025
Voir →
SCEA DE GUILLY
04/11/2025
Voir →