jugement en date du 22 juin 1989 par lequel le tribunal administratif de Nantes a rejeté leur demande tendant à obtenir l'annulation de l'arrêté en date du 9 janvier 1989 par lequel le maire de La Bernerie-en-Retz

  In her observations the Federal Attorney pointed out, inter alia , that the applicant, when accusations had been raised against her during her questioning, had always been able to read the respective

  The Court did not accept the Government’s contention that the legal characterisation of the offence had been of little importance as long as the alternative conviction had been based on the same

Berg, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. On 22 December 2009 the applicant unsuccessfully applied for asylum in the Netherlands.

Berg, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. On 18 March 2013 the applicant applied for asylum in the Netherlands.

That application had been lodged by the other ten other prisoners who had been injured on 20   July 1995 in Buca Prison.   2.

Consequently, that principle had been contravened, in violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

Berro-Lefèvre, judges, and Mr S.

  Moreover, as C.G. had been expelled on the very day he had received his deportation order, he had only been able to challenge the measures against him once outside Bulgaria.

In its reply of 12 June 1996, the Poznań Custody Centre, to which the complaint had been forwarded for investigation, informed him that his medical records had been examined.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.

1990 and had been taken to hospital without delay; that an investigation had been begun immediately; and that the applicant had been able to intervene in the criminal proceedings against the police officers

Par une décision du 13 décembre 2021, le maire de Bernes-sur-Oise a rejeté ce recours.

in 1990 and that he had been unconscious.

The applicant further argued that his rights under Article 8 had been violated as he had not been able to see his family during the time he was in detention.

    The applicant complains under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention that after having been arrested he had not been brought before a “judge” or “officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power

He also complains that his case before the Constitutional Court has not been heard within a reasonable time.

However, since then no new information has been obtained. COMPLAINTS 14.

septembre 2007) d'avoir dit que le film "His girl friday" est protégé en France et que son exploitation sous forme vidéographique est soumise à autorisation, alors, selon le moyen, que la Convention de Berne