The applicant stated that he had decided to move to Russia permanently in 2008 because he had feared for his life. A private security agency in Moscow had hired him as a bodyguard. 12.

Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

The courts should not take account of any such circumstances occurring later than one year after the judgment became binding.

Tax claims can be upheld and judged in criminal proceedings because of offences against the Act. Fines for offences against this Act go to the Treasury.

    However, that hearing was again adjourned because the police were unable to locate J.N. The only information available was that she had been living in Spain for the last four years. 32.

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,  

He had difficulty breathing because of the bag that covered his head.

SECTION DECISION Application no. 38977/15 Rosario SOFIA against San Marino The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 2   May   2017 as a Chamber composed of:   Linos-Alexandre

    The applicants were represented by Mr Alexandru Găzdag and then by the first applicant, Mr Dov Tamir.

  and the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian national, Mr Alexandru

We need the legislation because the forfeiture powers in existing law have proved inadequate.

She also maintained that Turkish military forces prevent her from having access to and from using and enjoying her home and property because she is Greek Orthodox and of Greek-Cypriot origin, in violation

The money was identifiable because the banknotes had been marked with a special paint beforehand.

The judgment was not appealed against and became final. 11.     On 22 July 2006 the applicant was released on completing his sentence. B.     Alleged ill-treatment 12.

It became final on 9 March 2011. The amount awarded was paid to the fifth applicant. [1] B.     Relevant domestic law and practice 1.

The relevant judgment of 25   August 2006 was upheld on appeal by the Regional Court and became final on 11   October 2006.

Court informed the applicant that, according to the information provided by the Administrative Court, the proceedings complained of had been discontinued by the Administrative Court on 16 January 2003, because

sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro, President ,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Linos-Alexandre

    Subsequently, on 22 September 2011 the applicant argued that Article 466 of the CCrP had been inapplicable to his arrest because, at that time, the Russian authorities had not yet received