The Court notes that the applicant failed to make any claims as regards non-pecuniary damage. Accordingly, it   makes no award in this respect. 42.

It was represented by Mr   Valentyn Bodryaga, a lawyer practising in Mariupol. 3.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr   Ivan Lishchyna. 4.

It further held that it could not make a decision on the request for confiscation relying on expert reports made within the framework of the investigation (see paragraph 7 above), since that had been a

The Court further takes note of the wish of Ms Tamara Vladimirovna Zavyalova, Ms Lyudmila Gotlibovna Shpolvind, Mr Valentin Vasilyevich Borozdin, Mr   Aleksey Valentinovich Vasendin, Ms Tatyana Arkadyevna

  In the case of Valentin v.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE VALENCIENNES POLE SOCIAL JUGEMENT DU DIX SEPT JUILLET DEUX MIL VINGT QUATRE N° RG 23/00285 - N° Portalis DBZT-W-B7H-GADT N°MINUTE : 24/307 Le dix sept mai deux mil vingt quatre

    The applicant made no comments. 16.     The Court notes that the judgment given in the applicant's favour remained unenforced for six years and four months. 17.

The Court is therefore satisfied that the applicant made use of one of the remedies provided for by domestic legislation (see, mutatis   mutandis, Bălteanu , cited above, §§ 36-37).

It also found that a statement made by the applicant’s doctor that the applicant’s relatives had made periodical requests to change the type of the compulsory medical measure left an impression that the

Therefore, the Court makes no award in this respect. 31.

She has lived in a flat in a residential quarter of Valencia since 1970.

Grigoryevna), Ms Ragulina Zinaida Yakovlevna (in place of Mr   Ragulin Anatoliy Fedorovich) and Mr   Voronin Aleksey Yevlampiyevich (in place of Ms Voronina Valentina Fedorovna) in the case

EUR 15,000 (fifteen thousand euros) 11. 33895/17 26/04/2017 Ștefan-Valentin RĂUȚI 05/05/1988 Reșița   Ionuț MATEI Bucharest Son of a victim killed by gunfire on 24 December 1989 in Reșița.

Government requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicant’s reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Valentin

  Principal facts   The applicant, Mr Valentin Sorin Costreie, is a Romanian national who was born in 1971 and lives in Bucharest.

Later she managed to make contact with the mother and found out about the applicant’s death and the mother’s serious health issues.

    One month later relatives of Valentina Fotieyeva collected her body and buried it in a cemetery in Grozny. 22.

Mr Janko Sever, Ms Mara Pečnik and Mr Valentin Minov were represented before the Court by Mr B. Verstovšek, a lawyer practising in Celje.

sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 41311/16 and 70556/16 Georgică SLABU against Romania and Nicolae-Valentin