Therefore they concluded that in any case they have suffered a loss.

Thierry, conseiller rapporteur, MM. Grégoire, Renard-Payen, Durieux, conseillers, M. Savatier, Mme Bignon, conseillers référendaires, M.

that their affiliation with terrorist organisations had been proved and that they had established a criminal structure (see paragraph 6 above).

Currently, more than thirty-five criminal proceedings are pending. COMPLAINTS 1.

to the applicant on 26 May 1998, that is to say less than two months after the Court of Cassation’s judgment.

to the applicant on 26 May 1998, that is to say less than two months after the Court of Cassation’s judgment.

26 May 1998, that is to say less than three months after the Court of Cassation’s judgment.

to the applicant on 26 May 1998, that is to say less than three months after the Court of Cassation’s judgment.

to the applicant on 26 May 1998, that is to say less than three months after the Court of Cassation’s judgment.

He therefore alleges that there are no effective remedies in Turkey concerning complaints of this kind.

motor vehicle tax and that the aim of this was effectively to prevent the use of fuel other than fuel intended for traffic.

They argued in particular that the legislator in the 1970ies had justified this provision on the theory that male adolescents were at a risk of being recruited into homosexuality while female adolescents

Thierry Y..., tous demeurant à Gisy (Aisne), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 28 février 1986 par la cour d'appel d'Amiens (3ème chambre), au profit de M.

They submit that the statements made by the applicant during his pre-trial detention were not the sole ground for his conviction.

that they were untrue.

The Belgian authorities stated in particular that there was no evidence that the applicants had left the territory of the European Union Member States for more than three months.

He did not submit that if the passages in issue contained statements of fact that they were justified as being true.

Représentée par Me Jana KRATKA, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER INTIMES : Mme [W] [C] [Adresse 6] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Mélanie MAINGOURD de la SCP CASANOVA - MAINGOURD - THAI

that there has been any discrimination against the applicant on any grounds.