He claims that he cannot meet his daughter as he risks being expelled.     COMPLAINTS   1.

On 14 April 1999 the National Immigration Board ( Statens invandrar-verk ) rejected the application and ordered that the applicant be expelled to Iran.

        On 1 July 1993 the National Immigration Board (Statens Invandrarverk, hereinafter the SIV) drew up a report on the applicant's reason for his request for asylum and

       On 26 November 1991 the National Immigration Board (Statens Invandrarverk) rejected the application, stating as follows:   (Translation)      &#

In so far as those reasons persisted and the lawfulness of the applicant’s detention was reviewed multiple times, the domestic court cannot be reproached for a certain repetitiveness in the wording of

März 1993 angesetzt ist, so       kann die hier in Frage stehende Haft nicht als übermässig bezeichnet       werden."

Steiner,   Mr   K. Hajiyev,   Mr   D. Spielmann,   Mr   S.E. Jebens, judges, and Mr S.

  By virtue of an authorisation in the Ordinance, the National Board of Agriculture (Statens jordbruksverk), on 30 July 1993, issued more detailed regulations on this matter.

Consequently, this reason cannot be considered as relevant and sufficient either. 76.

  The court of review cannot substitute its own decision on the merits of the case for that of the decision-making authority.

        The Commission considers that it cannot, on the basis of the file, determine the admissibility of this complaint.

        On 27 May 1993 the applicant's asylum request was rejected after an oral hearing before the National Immigration Board (Statens invandrarverk).

The Swedish Board of Agriculture ( Statens Jordbruksverk , hereinafter “the Board”) did not accept the proposed accord and summoned the applicants before the District Court ( tingsrätten ) of Jönköping

Transfer could be delayed if there were “contraindications” ( contra-indicaties ) such as, for example, a serious danger of absconding (Lower House of Parliament ( Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal ), parliamentary

The law-enforcement authorities cannot construe the notion of “good faith” as imposing any additional duties on the taxpayer which are not provided for by law.

        On 18 June 1991 the National Immigration Board (statens invandrarverk) rejected the applicant's request, having regard to the stamps in his passport and questioning

The hearing was adjourned until November 1994 for an additional inquiry and the calling of two experts of the National Legal Serological Institute (Statens Rättsserologiska Institut).

the services of seconded employees and, in addition, if this secondment had taken place under a permit referred to in Article 2 para. 1a of Act on Secondment of Workers ( Wet op het ter beschikking stellen

Where a retrial is prohibited per se , its outcome cannot be seen as compatible with the Convention.

        On 2 October 1991 the National Immigration Board (Statens invandrarverk) refrained from deciding on the asylum request and referred the matter to the Government in