By decisions of the same date H.S.

On the same day his ability to move his extremities improved slightly. 32.

    In August 2011 the applicant company filed a civil claim with the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”) against the gas supply company (“the opposing

On 28 December 2012 the case file, including the finalised indictment, was sent to the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”) for examination on the merits.

    It appears that later in 2007 the applicant brought a claim in the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court to have K.’s ownership of the house recognised. 11.

    On the same day the applicant was taken to the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan. At the request of investigator A.K., the court ordered his remand in custody. 14.

On the same date the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan examined the investigator’s application and decided to grant it.

    On the same date another record was drawn up according to which Senr. Lt.

APPELANTE Madame [Q] [K], demeurant [Adresse 1] comparante en personne, assistée de Me Claudie HUBERT, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, vestiaire : 109 substitué par Me Samy ARAISSIA, avocat

    On the same date at around 8 p.m. an investigator of the Second Garrison Investigation Department of the Investigative Service of the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Armenia (Hadrut

    On 15 November 2004 the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”) allowed the applicant’s action and ordered the debtor to demolish the constructions. 8

Her heirs, Mr Barkev Kamer Shirin, Mr   Kamer Barkev Shirin and Ms Araksi Barkev Shirin-Junglas, expressed a wish to continue the application in her stead. 2.

The reasons given, and the restrictions imposed, were the same as those in the previous order. 27.

On the same date, the Court decided to apply Article   29 §   3 of the Convention and to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. 4.

    Later the same day the applicant went to Arabkir police station, where many people had gathered in support of the arrested demonstrators.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1 of the Convention). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

The same day, at 23.10, the applicant was arrested and brought to the Arabkir District Police Station of Yerevan ( ՀՀ ոստիկանության Երևան քաղաքի Արաբկիրի բաժին ).

also complained, under Article   7, of the retrospective application of certain amendments to the mechanism of renewal of the special prison regime and the second applicant complained under the same

remained the same since the CPT’s periodic visit in 2010 and raised numerous problems (see paragraph 41 above).