Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicant’s peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 (see Burden v.

If so, the parties are requested to clarify where they are being detained and what are the material conditions of their detention. 2.

Consequently, the part of the judgment granting the claim in part became final.

Le lendemain, elle interjeta appel, demandant à être relevée de la forclusion du délai d’appel de trente jours qui avait commencé à courir à partir du prononcé du jugement.

Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

The results of that survey, which were unfavourable to the Foundation, were made public shortly afterwards, while the Foundation discredited them by alleging that the survey had not been part of the applicant

. 59943/19 Ali KARIMLI against Azerbaijan lodged on 24 October 2019 communicated on 25 November 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is a well-known politician and the leader of a political party

Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Can the applicants claim to be victims of the alleged violations of the Convention?

Əsgərov, and to declare the remainder of the applications inadmissible; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 27 January 2026, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on

(SDS), which was then part of the opposition in parliament. 6 .

QUESTIONS AUX PARTIES 1.

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicants have “possessions” within the meaning of Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention?

On 26 October 2016 the first applicant requested that the ban on visits be lifted entirely or at least in part.

TÜRKİYE (No. 2) (Application no. 2170/24) QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES        Has the applicant exhausted domestic remedies, as required by Article   35 § 1 of the Convention?

    QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Does the possibility that the applicants could be subjected to secret surveillance without external/judicial control represent an unjustified/disproportionate potential