27094/20, § 26, 27 June 2023; Michaud v. France , no.   12323/11, §   51, ECHR   2012 ; Modinos v. Cyprus , 22 April 1993, §§   20 and 23-24, Series A no.

  France (dec.) [GC], no.   76642/01, § 32, ECHR 2006 XIV). The Court reiterates that in its recent decisions of Dadusenko and Others v.

générale des Impôts, en vertu de l'article L. 16 B du Livre des procédures fiscales, à effectuer une visite et une saisie de documents dans les locaux de la société à responsabilité limitée Peinture, décoration

Russia (dec.), no.   50799/08, 18 February 2014; Scholvien and Others v. Germany (dec.), no. 13166/08, 12 November 2013, Święch v. Poland (dec.), no. 60551/11, 1   July 2013 and Gil v.

Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwińska v.   Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). 13.

Italy (no. 1) (dec.) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 202-207, ECHR 2006-V).

In concomitant proceedings he unsuccessfully sued in relation to the television broadcast of the film and the actor’s interview given as Mikhail Stasov.

Croatia (dec.), no. 45943/99, 13 September 2001; Petersen v. Denmark , no.   28288/95, Commission decision of 16 April 1998).

This property was his permanent residence and that of his family, where his wife Sophia Andreou Ioannou, Michael Michael, Christina Michael, and himself, lived.

6ème Chambre ARRET du 16 JANVIER 2002 Décision déférée : JUGEMENT JEX du TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE de LYON en date du 24 Octobre 2000 (RG : 200009204) N° RG Cour : 2000/06782 Nature du recours : DECL

          Application No. 34399/97                     by Michael

MARSEILLE Pôle de Proximité JUGEMENT DU : 01 Juillet 2024 Président : Monsieur BIDAL, Juge Greffier : Mme SCANNAPIECO, Débats en audience publique le : 15 Avril 2024 GROSSE : Le 01/07/24 à Me MICHEL

Mikaël REDEUIL Juge : M. Samuel THOUROUDE Juge : M.

0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 15115/15 and 53354/15 Michael

s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 30123/18 Michael

Spain (dec.), no.   43555/98, 29   August 2000, and Sevillano González v. Spain (dec.), no.

On 20 October 1999 the applicant appealed against the divorce decree.

The authorisation to obtain the said data directly from the banks was issued pursuant to Article 51 § 2 (7) of Presidential Decree no. 633 of 1972 and Article 32 § 1 (7) of Presidential Decree no. 600

In the case of Michael v.

Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26   June   2007, and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03). 15.