Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant instituted compensation proceedings before the City Court ( Retten i Roskilde ), which on 24 March 2013 found against him.

In his appeal on points of law lodged with the Supreme Court of Cassation, the applicant contested the finding that he had acquired the bank notes “in the period from 26 March 2005 to 10 January 2007”,

A hearing was held on 24 March 1999.

  In spite of the ban, the march took place as planned on 27 May 2000.

CASSATION, TROISIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le premier moyen : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué ( Versailles, 4 avril 2001), rendu sur renvoi après cassation (Civ. 3, 23 mars

The Central Office asked its medical commission to examine the findings of the expert report commissioned by the Zagreb Office, and on 16 March 2012 the medical commission, on the basis of the available

On 13 April 2012 the expert produced his report, finding that the applicant’s condition was not of such gravity as to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

The award against it had thus stemmed from the finding against the first applicant.

By a decision of 28 July 2010 Kutaisi Court of Appeal fully upheld the applicant’s conviction of 18 March 2010.

at any time request a review of the finding or any punishment awarded (or both); and where he does so, the finding or punishment (or both) shall be reviewed. (3)     The finding or any punishment

The representatives of the Orthodox Church also spoke publicly against the march. The Tyumen Administration refused permission to hold a gay march.

  On 14 March 1985 he set down the hearing for 11 April.

April 2010 six years three instances action dismissed 17 C 204/2007 compensation for the length of the proceedings no. 37 C 51/2004 12 June 2007 24 April 2014 six years and ten months four instances finding

    Criminal proceedings against the applicant On 21 March 2005 the applicant was arrested by the police, On 23 March 2005 the Bielsko-Biała District Court remanded the applicant in custody in

The applicant in her capacity of director brought an action for judicial review, challenging the Ministry’s decision and the findings of the inspection on factual and legal grounds.

On 14 March 2017 the Gdańsk Court of Appeal amended the first-instance judgment and decided to place the applicant at the Gostynin Centre.

On 30 March 2013, when the applicant left his home, he was arrested by four plain-clothes police officers.

On 1 March 2021 the Constitutional Court rejected the applicant’s complaint regarding prohibition of ill-treatment for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.

The applicant remained in custody in Mersin Security Directorate until 3   March 2018, when he was placed in pre-trial detention by the Magistrates’ Court.