Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial.” 11.     The Government argued that the complaint was inadmissible. 12.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

    The Government submitted that the Local Court had provided the   applicant with the guarantees under Article 5 § 4.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Nevertheless, a State which institutes such a system must in principle accord to the detainees the same guarantees on appeal as at first instance (see Fodale v.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

Nevertheless, a State which institutes such a system must in principle accord to the detainees the same guarantees on appeal as at first instance (see Fodale v.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review)

A court examining an appeal against detention must provide guarantees of a judicial procedure.

Nevertheless, a State which institutes such a system must in principle accord to the detainees the same guarantees on appeal as at first instance (see Fodale v.

Nevertheless, a State which institutes such a system must in principle accord to the detainees the same guarantees on appeal as at first instance (see Fodale v.

Consequently, the proceedings before the investigating judge and the Riga Regional Court did not comply with the guarantees afforded by Article   5 § 4 (see Lamy , § 29, and Garcia Alva , §§ 40-43