innocence on account of the unqualified character of the statement made by the Ramenskiy Town Court of Moscow Region in its extension order of 19 August 2020, which amounted to a pronouncement on his guilt

By its same judgment no. 2634/2019, the Three-Member Athens Court of Appeal found C.P. guilty as instigator to the offence of fraud allegedly committed by the applicant as an author.

before he has been proved guilty according to law.

All that the Crown seek to do is use evidence to prove a charge of which they have consistently maintained the respondent is guilty and where that guilt remains to be judicially determined.” 25 .

Following successive breaks to consider the matter, the same court found the applicant guilty of contempt of court and sentenced him to five days’ imprisonment.

REMOND, Juge du Tribunal judiciaire de VANNES, Juge chargée de l'exécution, Assistée de Emmanuelle BEDOUET, greffière, ENTRE PARTIE DEMANDERESSE : Monsieur [L] [R] 22 rue Saint Louis 56490 GUILLIERS

  Two of the applicant's co-accused pleaded guilty and were convicted upon their pleas.   The applicant pleaded not guilty.   He was legally represented.

    On 27 February 2009 the applicant was found guilty of administrative offence of drunk driving. His driving licence was withdrawn for a period of two years. 2.

Lagardère guilty”.

without that guilt having been proved according to law.

authorities, and judicial decisions, other than those on guilt, do not refer to that person as being guilty.

This may be so even in the absence of any formal finding; it suffices that there is some reasoning suggesting that the court regards the accused as guilty.” 27.

However, although the statements as to his guilt had been made in judicial proceedings in which he had not been the defendant, those proceedings had taken place at the same time as and in connection with

Relying in particular on a record drawn up on the basis of the two witness statements in question, the National Security Court found the applicant guilty of secessionist acts, considered it established

) and to respect for his private life (Article 8 of the Convention) on account of a statement made by a court in the course of inheritance proceedings that the applicant was guilty of a   crime for

He was found guilty on two counts of obtaining property by threats of force and inducing another to pervert the course of justice.

On 10   January 2006 the Oktyabrskiy District Court of Samara found the applicant guilty of abuse of power and drug dealing and sentenced him to eight and a half years’ imprisonment.

On 28/09/05 a jury issued a verdict, finding the applicant guilty. On 12/10/05 K. published in a local newspaper an article.

The court referred, among other evidence of the applicant’s guilt, to the administrative-offence proceedings for hooliganism that had been discontinued on 1   February 2010. 8.