CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

152 résultats pour « Elsie DALMAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921JUD004933707

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2010

21 septembre 2010

France , 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198; and Dalia v. France , 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports 1998-I).

Page 6 sur 8

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD000379522

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2025

15 mai 2025

should also have stated the specific ways in which it foresaw that the licence might be abused, on the basis of an assessment of probable dangerousness based on logical inferences supported by some elements

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC002590702

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2005

30 juin 2005

#xa0; 2001, decided to re-close the estate and refer [the applicant], who will be sent a transcript with guidelines on appeal, to institute an action in damages against the Probate Court or any body else

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524JUD001452103

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2011

24 mai 2011

Furthermore, measures depriving a person of his liberty may often involve an inevitable element of suffering or humiliation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011JUD000505610

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

Belgium , 7 August 1996, § 35, Reports 1996 ‑ III; Dalia , cited above, § 54; Baghli , cited above, § 48 in fine ; and Jankov v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923DEC002745109

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2010

23 septembre 2010

remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Akdivar and Others , cited above, § 66, and Dalia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1205DEC007120017

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2023

5 décembre 2023

The television channel quoted President Dalia Grybauskaitė, as having stated to journalists that “free housing” was “a nomenklatura privilege” and, having suggested that the Government would refer the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-231303

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

CUGINI 1980 Amandola italienne Antonio Paolo CUPPONE 1965 SECLI’ italienne Annamaria DABBICCO 1970 Bari italienne Cinzia D’AGOSTINO 1972 NOTARESCO italienne Giovanni DALFINO 1983 Milano italienne Marco DALLA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708JUD000391013

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2014

8 juillet 2014

The Court has further held that there will be no family life between parents and adult children unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence (see Kwakye-Nti and Dufie v. the Netherlands

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD004965809

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

It is incumbent on the respondent State to demonstrate that these requirements are satisfied (see, inter alia, Dalia v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0625JUD005843717

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2024

25 juin 2024

The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD007520401

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2006

5 octobre 2006

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Dalia v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0612DEC006869301

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2003

12 juin 2003

France, judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, § 27, Dalia v. France , judgment of 19   February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions   1998-I, § 38 and Susini and others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0420JUD004575605

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2010

20 avril 2010

France , 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198; Dalia v. France , 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I; Mifsud v. France (dec.)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612JUD004778110

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2018

12 juin 2018

France , 26 September 1997, § 34, Reports 1997-VI; Dalia v. France , 19 February 1998, § 52, Reports 1998-I; Boultif , cited above, §   46, ECHR 2001-IX; and Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623JUD003255005

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

  11–12, §   27, and Dalia v. France , judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, pp. 87-88, §   38).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD002532905

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2010

26 octobre 2010

25329/05) against the Slovak Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Swiss national, Ms Dagmar

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0516DEC006291200

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2002

16 mai 2002

sum up, almost two thirds of the prisoners accommodated in the closed unit were subject to an impoverished regime; the typical daily programme for a non-working prisoner was found to consist of little else

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705JUD004641099

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2005

5 juillet 2005

be determined whether the interference was “necessary in a democratic society”, that is to say justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see Dalia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD000310205

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2007

21 juin 2007

  11–12, §   27, and Dalia v. France , judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, pp. 87-88, §   38).

Source officielle