CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921JUD004933707
21 septembre 2010
France , 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198; and Dalia v. France , 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports 1998-I).
Page 6 sur 8
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD000379522
15 mai 2025
should also have stated the specific ways in which it foresaw that the licence might be abused, on the basis of an assessment of probable dangerousness based on logical inferences supported by some elements
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0630DEC002590702
30 juin 2005
#xa0; 2001, decided to re-close the estate and refer [the applicant], who will be sent a transcript with guidelines on appeal, to institute an action in damages against the Probate Court or any body else
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524JUD001452103
24 mai 2011
Furthermore, measures depriving a person of his liberty may often involve an inevitable element of suffering or humiliation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011JUD000505610
11 octobre 2011
Belgium , 7 August 1996, § 35, Reports 1996 ‑ III; Dalia , cited above, § 54; Baghli , cited above, § 48 in fine ; and Jankov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923DEC002745109
23 septembre 2010
remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Akdivar and Others , cited above, § 66, and Dalia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1205DEC007120017
5 décembre 2023
The television channel quoted President Dalia Grybauskaitė, as having stated to journalists that “free housing” was “a nomenklatura privilege” and, having suggested that the Government would refer the
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-231303
1 février 2024
CUGINI 1980 Amandola italienne Antonio Paolo CUPPONE 1965 SECLI’ italienne Annamaria DABBICCO 1970 Bari italienne Cinzia D’AGOSTINO 1972 NOTARESCO italienne Giovanni DALFINO 1983 Milano italienne Marco DALLA
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708JUD000391013
8 juillet 2014
The Court has further held that there will be no family life between parents and adult children unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence (see Kwakye-Nti and Dufie v. the Netherlands
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD004965809
9 octobre 2012
It is incumbent on the respondent State to demonstrate that these requirements are satisfied (see, inter alia, Dalia v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0625JUD005843717
25 juin 2024
The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD007520401
5 octobre 2006
The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Dalia v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0612DEC006869301
12 juin 2003
France, judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, § 27, Dalia v. France , judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, § 38 and Susini and others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0420JUD004575605
20 avril 2010
France , 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198; Dalia v. France , 19 February 1998, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I; Mifsud v. France (dec.)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612JUD004778110
12 juin 2018
France , 26 September 1997, § 34, Reports 1997-VI; Dalia v. France , 19 February 1998, § 52, Reports 1998-I; Boultif , cited above, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX; and Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623JUD003255005
23 juin 2009
11–12, § 27, and Dalia v. France , judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, pp. 87-88, § 38).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD002532905
26 octobre 2010
25329/05) against the Slovak Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Swiss national, Ms Dagmar
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0516DEC006291200
16 mai 2002
sum up, almost two thirds of the prisoners accommodated in the closed unit were subject to an impoverished regime; the typical daily programme for a non-working prisoner was found to consist of little else
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705JUD004641099
5 juillet 2005
be determined whether the interference was “necessary in a democratic society”, that is to say justified by a pressing social need and, in particular, proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued (see Dalia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD000310205
21 juin 2007