Failing such restitution by the respondent State, the Court holds that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, in respect of pecuniary damage, an amount corresponding to the current

line with the presumption of innocence, which places the burden of proof of all elements of the accusation on the prosecution and requires that any doubt should benefit the accused (see, for example, Barberà

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention;   2.

In appropriate cases, this may include compensation in respect of loss of earnings (see, among other authorities, Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v.

that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention; Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the complaints under Article 8 and Article 13 of the Convention in

    On 14 March 2000 the Chamber decided to hold a hearing (Rule 59 §   2). 6.

    The Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s decision on 20   February 1997, rejecting the applicant’s request to hold an oral hearing.

  They consider that these requests implied a request to hold an oral hearing.

The resolution shall [set out the] decision on the authorisation to hold a judge criminally liable, together with the reasons for that decision. 2d.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   4.

    Holds that there has been no violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention;   4.

This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.... 2.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 2 of the Convention;   2.

Holzer, rapporteur public ; - et les observations de Me Lacrouts, pour le requérant, de Me Barbaro, pour la commune de Menton, et de Me Repeta, pour la société civile de construction vente Menton-Borrigo

        Un hold up suivi d'un meurtre eut lieu le 31 octobre 1983 dans une bijouterie à Madrid.

Relevant domestic case-law (a) Antonella Barbara and 55 others – judgment of the Milan Labour Court of 8 November 2007 In relation to the matter at issue in the present applications, the Milan Labour Court

CHAMBRE SOCIALE C ARRÊT DU 02 NOVEMBRE 2023 APPELANTE : S.A.R.L. [4] [Adresse 5] [Adresse 5] [Adresse 5] représentée par Me Tristan HUBERT, avocat postulant du barreau de LYON et Me HOLLE

Further, the Court reiterates that it holds a State responsible under the “reasonable time” aspect of Article   6 § 1 for delay by judges in delivering their judgments (see McFarlane v.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention;   2.