Moreover, the present case did not concern the question whether the second applicant should or should not grow up in a same-sex family. He was already part of a de facto same-sex family.

Prior to 1994, the family lived in a flat and a house in Grozny. They submitted that the first applicant had owned a flat at 1-27 Vosmogo Marta Street.

1968 Marco FARINA 1963 Alessandro FARZATI 1964 Giuseppe FASOLINO 1965 Carlo FERRARI 1966 Franco FERRARI 1957 Marco FILOMENA 1964 Francesco FIORE 1964 Dario FLAMMINI 1949 Italo FRASCA 1971 Mauro FREDDO

also have been refused a residence permit sought for family reasons in Italy.

    Since the summer of 2013 the family had travelled on several occasions between Portugal and Romania.

  Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Ms Berecová complains about the placement of her children in institutional care.

no family or other ties in Pakistan, his mother, brothers, British girlfriend and daughter all residing in the United Kingdom.

Family Code of Ukraine 10 .     The relevant provisions of the Family Code read as follows: Article 3. Family “1.     The family is the primary and basic unit of society. 2.

On 15 May 2000 the Shostka City Execution Service informed the applicant that UAH 1,223.56 were to be paid to the family, but that it was not possible to execute the decision in full.

HOLDING INVESTMENTS [Localité 2] - venant aux droits de HOLDING FINANCIERE ET IMMOBILIERE [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] représentée par Maître Alexandre FAURE de la SELARL LEXWIN AVOCATS, avocat au barreau

margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 211 October 2017 Alexandru

    Attempts to establish family life in Norway and decisions regarding the first applicant and his family 14.

    On 11 October 2001 S.D. lodged an interim application with the Family Court of First Instance of Athens asking to have the applicant’s visiting rights withdrawn.

  Finally, the applicant complains under Article 8 that his return to prison after a period of four years at liberty constituted an unjustified interference with his private and family life.

    Family Code 20 .

He did not mention either his son, or his family and his wish to be reunited with it. In the Government’s view, the applicant did not have close family relations with either his wife or his son.

Portugal (29813/96 and 30229/96)                  Just satisfaction   The applicants, all Portuguese nationals, are: Alexandre de Almeida Garrett, José

others against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 7   April   2015 as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre

In respect of costs and expenses, the Court awarded Mr Almeida Garrett 3,500,000 Portuguese escudos and the Mascarenhas Falcão family 2,000,000 escudos.   1.