CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1221JUD001288919
21 décembre 2021
Ichim, a lawyer practising in Iași; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning the alleged breach of the applicant’s rights to a fair hearing, to equality of arms, of defence and to respect
Page 59 sur 101900
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0723JUD002805213
23 juillet 2019
THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5. The applicant was born in 1970 and lives in Kherson. 6 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906JUD004271519
6 septembre 2022
The Court considers that if the Court of Appeal was to ensure a fair trial, it was under a duty to take positive measures in order to rehear the absent witnesses, notwithstanding the fact
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017JUD003678503
17 octobre 2017
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD002081724
23 octobre 2025
THE FACTS 3. The applicant’s details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table. THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD002494805
22 novembre 2016
THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5. The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Roslavl, the Smolensk Region. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1130JUD000063610
30 novembre 2017
THE FACTS 3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD007503714
22 octobre 2020
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625JUD005716209
25 juin 2019
The first applicant appealed against the judgment on points of fact and law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0209JUD006231809
9 février 2021
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD000902111
25 mars 2021
THE FACTS 2. The applicant was born in 1933 and lives in Dnipro. The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Mr A.S. Kychenok , a lawyer practising in Kyiv. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1109JUD006141715
9 novembre 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0428JUD002347215
28 avril 2022
It also complained that no oral hearing had been held before the High Administrative Court even though certain facts remained unestablished. 19 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD005730118
18 juillet 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0921JUD002368914
21 septembre 2023
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12579
25 juillet 2019
Georgia - 37809/08 Judgment 25.7.2019 [Section V] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Conviction by substitute judge based on transcripts of oral evidence without hearing witnesses
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0409JUD001752004
9 avril 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617JUD004385412
17 juin 2021
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. ARREST AND SEARCH OF THE APPLICANT 5 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0507JUD003036409
7 mai 2020
THE FACTS 2. The applicant was born in 1961 and is currently detained in Tbilisi.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13947
15 décembre 2022
to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union: violation Facts – The applicants were a company and its marketing director.