Beschwerden geht es um eine der großen Fragen, die sich nach der deutschen Wiedervereinigung gestellt haben: In welcher Weise ist den Personen, die entweder nach 1949 in der DDR oder ‑   wie

ETF, prise en la personne de son représentant légal, domicilié ès qualités audit siège sis [Adresse 1] représentée par Me Frédéric CALINAUD de l'AARPI WIRE, avocat au barreau de PARIS * * * Vu le

I was standing about 10 metres to the south of the Turkish barbed wire demarcation, approximately 15 metres to the west of the roadway.

Nothing, however, had been said to include the present case among those cases, except for the theoretical possibility that his wife could die before the applicant.

    On 21 October 2002 when visiting the applicant his wife handed the Court's letter to him.

In August 2000 he and his wife separated.

  Summary of the facts   In 1960 Louis Depalle and his wife purchased, by notarial deed, a dwelling house in the municipality of Arradon.

  Particular circumstances of the case     In 1991 the applicant and his wife divorced.

    Facts prior to 1 May 1993 The applicant’s wife died on 15   May   1990.

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } FOURTH SECTION Application no. 72861/11 M.M. and Others against Finland lodged on 25 November 2011   STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicants, M.M., his wife

On 18 January 2001 the first applicant’s wife wrote a complaint to the Simferopol District Prosecutor’s Office (the SDPO) requesting to investigate the allegedly unlawful actions of officer S.

His wife and the five children they had at the time joined him in Cyprus on 9 September 2008. On 16 September 2008 his wife applied for asylum and the two applications were joined.

He was deported to Turkey the same day, without being allowed to get in touch with a lawyer or his wife and daughter. His subsequent appeal to the Minister of Internal Affairs was dismissed.

by the Court in this case concerns the right to respect for private life, due to the unforeseeable character of the legislation in force between 1990 and 1997 which conferred on the authorities very wide

The applicant tried to maintain contact with his daughter, but his wife hindered systematically his attempts.

and cultural topics, the Court considered that the respondent State’s margin of appreciation in the applicant’s case was necessarily a wide one.

On 29 November 2010 the applicant’s wife signed an agreement with Mr   O.O.

  On 22 December 1998 the Ombudsman found that the prison administration had censored a letter from the applicant to his wife in which he had accused the prison staff of theft and, as a consequence

His wife came to Latvia in 1969 and their daughter was born there.