From these new statements the Minister concluded that the applicant had been fully aware of his actions when transporting the drugs across the border between the Netherlands and Belgium.

    In an unrelated case leading to a Supreme Court judgment, the claimants sought a ruling declaring that a piece of real property fell within the estate of their ancestor.

Numerous witnesses and experts were heard, and several expert opinions and other pieces of written evidence were produced. 29 .

The applicant’s father and sister stated that they had been aware of Ms   I.   Kh.’s pregnancy.

Mr Zabchekov then attempted to run away, and C. ran after him.

A police officer told the second applicant that Mr Brougham was “a nasty piece of work” who was wanted elsewhere by the police. 9.

La pièce n°37-4 mentionne également ces RSU pour les « Directeurs seniors et en dessous » et les distingue des CSPU et MSU octroyés aux « VP+ », soit les vices présidents comme Mme [R].

The selection of these pieces of evidence was in the public prosecutor’s discretion.

    The applicant, a columnist, was criminally convicted for defamation for having criticised a journalist in an opinion piece.

Public interest in the expropriation of a piece of real estate is “established by law, or on the basis of law”. 27.

The prosecutor also indicated that E.I. had submitted two pieces of evidence as part of her defence which had been ignored in the ordinary proceedings.

It also held that the pieces of evidence in the case file were in conflict with each other. 22 .

However, the applicant consistently challenged the lawfulness of those pieces of evidence. 47.

versée par l'employeur a été rédigée en mai 2016 pour les besoins de la cause ; il résulte dans tous les cas de cette pièce que les cadres sont majoritairement payés au-dessus du marché s'agissant de

During his detention, Halil was only given one piece of bread a day and allowed to go to the toilet once a day.

She was asked to write down names for her future child on a piece of paper. The first applicant was subsequently transferred to theatre and a Caesarean section was performed on her.

    The Court awards the applicant EUR 535 in respect of pecuniary damage. It further considers that he must have suffered non-pecuniary damage on account of the violation found.

On 10 July 1992 the applicants became aware of the fact that they had been reported to the police.

    In the absence of any request for non-pecuniary damage, the Court is not called on to make any award of that kind (see Amat-G Ltd and Mebaghishvili v.   Georgia , no.