5 of the Volsk district in Saratov Region found the applicant guilty as charged and imposed on her a fine in the amount of 35,000   Russian roubles (RUB).

[The applicant] contests his guilt and requests to be released from custody. ...Further [the applicant] indicates that on 10 March 1999 he was unlawfully detained...

in her denying her guilt.

    In the proceedings, the applicant and certain co-defendants pleaded not guilty. The remaining co-defendants pleaded guilty in part.

The applicant further stated that he had pleaded guilty because the police officers had beaten him. 18.

    The first paragraph of Article 273 of the CCP provides that “no one shall be detained pending trial unless there is serious evidence of his guilt”. 42.

V.B., meanwhile, was found guilty of murder and illegally possessing a knife.

The   applicant admitted his guilt and gave further details about the robbery and murder.

It sentenced the applicant to life imprisonment and stated that his guilt was of a particular gravity (see paragraph 37 below). 16.

height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Résolution CM/ResDH(2012)128 [1]   Guill

A few minutes later, while the applicant was already being questioned, they were informed that the applicant had confessed his guilt. The applicant was then charged with manslaughter and robbery.

  The applicant complained that the Court of Appeal’s decision contained a finding of guilt which was still at issue in pending criminal proceedings before another court, in breach of the presumption

account the factual circumstances of the case, the information concerning Mr Guliyev’s personality: ... the applicant has never had administrative proceedings opened against him and has fully admitted his guilt

During the investigation the applicant pleaded not guilty and argued that she had not intended to offend anybody. She was a peaceful person who respected everybody’s religion.

On 12 October 2007 the District Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced her cumulatively to nine years’ imprisonment.

On 30 August 2011 the Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv, at a hearing with the participation of the lawyer contracted by the applicant on an unspecified date, found the applicant guilty of petty hooliganism

  On 25 May 2004 the court of Esposende found the applicant guilty and ordered to him to pay 25 day-fines for a total of EUR 1,750 together with court costs.

On 22 March 2006 the Kaunas Regional Court found the applicant guilty of fraud and abuse of office.

In 2018 the trial panel presided by Judge D.K. acquitted the first and third applicants of one count of giving and receiving a bribe and found all the applicants guilty of the remaining offences.